Official UK procurement notice
Utilising in silico, in vitro and ‘omics New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for priority-setting and safety assessment of tropane alkaloids (TAs) and other plant toxins as potential food contaminants. A case study for progressing the acceptance of NAMs for
Authority: Food Standards Agency (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionTenders were invited to carry out a range of project delivery options, to deliver against stages 1, 2 and 3 as described below:
Stage 1: This case study is to support the UK FSA’s policy need to determine which TAs are the most potent (neuro)toxicants so as to prioritise specific substances and inform decisions on the UK’s monitoring of these alkaloids in foods. An integral part of this aim is to confirm that neurotoxicity is the primary mode of action of these alkaloids. This aim will be achieved using a tiered-testing strategy of in silico, in vitro and ‘omics NAMs. This will then be extended to other plant alkaloids such as glycoalkaloids and pyridazine alkaloids.
Stage 2: To derive a HBGV for human exposure for the top priority, i.e. most potent substance within the class of TAs. This will utilise physiologically-based kinetic (PBK) modelling and quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE). This will then be extended to other plant alkaloids such as glycoalkaloids and pyridazine alkaloids.
Stage 3: From a methodological perspective, a broader third objective of the case study is to evaluate and attempt to build confidence within the FSA in the application of a series of relevant NAMs that have been integrated in a manner to address policy needs. These NAMs are tiered and incorporate existing human in vivo data as well as new testing on human in vitro cell lines, to maximise the relevance and accuracy to human food safety.
Please note contract start date is 22/09/2025
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedProcedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Direct award
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Notice status
- Awarded without competition
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Direct award (no call for competition)
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 24 Jul 2025, 16:43 BST
- Last source update
- 27 Oct 2025, 15:26 GMT
- Authority reference
C367576- FTS notice number
2025/S 000-068648- Latest notice
- Contract details notice (UK7)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0565d3Find a Tender
- Why no open competition
- Single Suppliers Intellectual Property Exclusive Rights
- Published justification
University of Birmingham have IPR rights to the systems that will be used as part of the case study.
- Risks
Delays in the overall delivery of the contract. Delays in the delivery of individual Milestones and/or Deliverables. Unplanned work that must be accommodated. Selection of service providers (subcontractors) proves challenging, i.e., they do not meet our criteria for high-quality, cost-effective. Delays imposed at import and export hubs during the shipment of samples (leading to thawing and degradation of cell samples). Insufficient data quality or poor reproducibility of omics data. Proposed experimental designs induce minimal (and non-significant) toxicological responses (Tier 2) and omics responses (Tier 3). While accurate budgeting has been completed during the planning phase, deviations are noted during the course of the contract. Availability of experienced scientists with sufficient expertise to cover all aspects of the proposed contract. Training courses are delivered at the wrong level.
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
18 Sept 2025 → 27 Oct 2025 · 2 dates- Standstill ends393 days ago18 Sept 2025, 23:59 BST
- Notice published354 days ago27 Oct 2025, 15:26 GMT
Notice history
4 events · 3 releases on Find a Tender · since 24 Jul 2025- Transparency notice published24 Jul 2025, 16:43 BSTUK5
- Contract award notice published9 Sept 2025, 11:48 BSTUK6
- Contract signature expected22 Sept 2025, 23:59 BSTscheduled
- Contract details notice published27 Oct 2025, 15:26 GMTUK7
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast| Awarded to | Value | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of BirminghamUtilising in silico, in vitro and ‘omics New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for p29 Sept 2025 – 10 May 2028 | £488,376 | 25 Aug 2025standstill to 18 Sept 2025 | Standstill |
| University of Birmingham | — | — | Awarded |
Contracts
Utilising in silico, in vitro and ‘omics New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for · University of Birmingham
- Signed
- 24 Sept 2025
- Value
- £488,376
- Period
- 25 Sept 2025 – 31 May 2028 · up to 31 Aug 2028 with extensions
- Status
- active
- Extensions
- The Buyer may extend the Contract for a period of up to 3 Months by giving not less than 10 Working Days' notice in writing to the Supplier prior to the Expiry Date. The Conditions of the Contract shall apply throughout any such extended period.
1 agreed KPI: Wellbeing: Improving Health and Wellbeing
- Wellbeing: Improving Health and Wellbeing, To be agreed at the initiation meeting
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Bidders & participating suppliers
1 commercial party on the notice- University of BirminghamAwarded supplier
Official documents & specifications (3)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Contract details notice Contract details notice on Find a Tender
- Contract award notice Contract award notice on Find a Tender
- Transparency notice Transparency notice on Find a Tender