Find a TenderAwarded without competition
Published 12 Mar 2021, 22:56 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Supply of Plant and associated Services

Official notice

Authority: The Minister for the Cabinet Office acting through the Cabinet Office

GoodsAward procedure without prior publication of a call for competition
Sectors: Medical Devices & Pharma (33) Delivery: UK
Awarded value£1,639,650published contract · exc. VAT
Awarded 20 Jul 2020no call for competition
Awarded to Crossgates Press Limited t/a DCR Machines

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The Cabinet Office will contract with a supplier to procure plant machinery which can be utilised for the production of UK-compliant non-medical face coverings (and Type IIR medical-grade masks in extremis), which are required to support the national effort to combat Covid-19.

CPV: Medical equipments

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Awarded
Delivery: UK
Extensions: 12 months from the installation and acceptance of all DCR machines purchased + 6 months extension option.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record · publisher note attached
Procedure method
Award procedure without prior publication of a call for competition
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Awarded without competition
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Direct award (no call for competition)
GPA / WTO covered
Yes (GPA)
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
12 Mar 2021, 22:56 GMT
Last source update
12 Mar 2021, 22:56 GMT
FTS notice number
2021/S 000-005120
Classification (CPV)
Medical equipments
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-029b71 Find a Tender
Why no open competition

Extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable for the contracting authority/entity and in accordance with the strict conditions stated in the directive

Published justification
  1. The COVID-19 outbreak is a Public Health Emergency of International Concern as declared by the World Health Organisation on 30 January 2020. The WHO Director-General characterised COVID-19 as a pandemic on 11 March 2020. As of 6 April 2020, scientific knowledge regarding the disease and its transmission is still emerging, however the WHO advises that COVID-19 transmission can occur via ‘infective respiratory droplets’ and wearing a mask represent one prevention measure that can limit the spread of viral diseases such as COVID-19.
  2. In April 2020 the UK did not possess any face covering manufacturing capability and was reliant on securing supplies from overseas producers. Problems were experienced in obtaining reliable supplies of medical PPE-grade masks in a global market due to the disruption to the supply chain caused by the pandemic. There was a concern that insufficient volumes of non-medical masks would become available or, if available, they would be of inferior quality or charged at exorbitant prices. Analysis by Cabinet Office (CO) in late April 2020 highlighted that the average price of respirator masks was £3.14 (medical-grade) and Type IIR (medical-grade) was £0.67, whilst non-medical was £0.51 per unit. During a normal trading period the cost of a Type IIR mask would be approximately £0.05 per unit, sourced from China.
  3. In April 2020 Cabinet Office (CO) considered it crucial in the public interest to source face covering production machinery in order to secure the UK’s domestic manufacturing capacity to:

a. produce medical grade masks immediately (if necessary);

b. create an immediate and reliable supply of high-quality non-medical face coverings at affordable prices for the domestic market; and

c. create national resilience to supply chain shocks within a global market.

This was because in April 2020 there was a considerable shortage of medical and non-medical PPE globally, there was real fear that items available would be impounded at boarders so domestic production was urgently required to mitigate the impact of COVID-19.

  1. Accordingly, CO worked with the trade association for UK manufacturing to identify a supplier that was capable of providing machines which could make non-medical or medical-grade masks. Therefore the machines could be diverted to produce medical-grade masks for the NHS if necessary.
  2. Therefore, an accelerated PCR procurement, was impossible. Any delay in engaging the market ran the risk of failing to secure production machinery (given the international demand for such equipment and the timelines involved in securing them). That would have caused knock-on delays to the production of face coverings in the required timeframe so undermining HMG efforts to mitigate Covid-19 risks in the UK.
  3. Accordingly, CO purchased ten lines of production machines from Crossgates Press Limited t/a DCR Machines (DCR Machines).
  4. CO is satisfied the tests permitting use of a direct award procedure (Regulation 32(2)(c)) are met (the explanation is set out in section VI.3 additional information):

Publisher note: As part of this contract award notice the following can be accessed at: https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/2ecda880-c198-48b0-b90e-ef6ba50d1b50 The text below is a continuation of paragraph 7 of Annex D1 a. There are genuine reasons for extreme urgency: CO has responded to Covid-19 immediately due to public health risks presenting a genuine emergency. The DCR Machines possess the capability to produce Type IIR face masks, which could be utilised by the NHS in extremis, therefore providing domestic resilience during the crisis. b. The events that have led to the need for extreme urgency were unforeseeable: The European Commission (Commissioner Breton – April 2020) has confirmed that the coronavirus crisis presents an extreme and unforeseeable urgency. c. It is impossible to comply with the usual timescales in the PCR: There was no time to run an accelerated procurement under the open, restricted or competitive procedures with negotiation that would allow CO to secure production machinery in the immediate term. That is particularly so in light of the likely delays to any procurement timeline – for example, drafting the technical documents required for the ITT stage – and the operational and commercial risks that would arise due to the delays. d. The situation is not attributable to the Contracting Authority: It has not done anything to cause or contribute to the need for extreme urgency. e. As far as is strictly necessary: The UK did not have suitable machinery available at the time the DCR Machines were purchased leaving the UK vulnerable should other countries have embargoed such machinery or medical and non-medical grade face coverings. A critical factor behind the selection of the DCR machines was they had the shortest lead time amongst available options, from point of purchase to delivery of the plant machinery in the UK.

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast
Awards 1
Awarded value £1,639,6501 contract exc. VAT
Bids received 1
Contracts signed 1latest 20 Jul 2020
Awarded toValueDateStatus
Crossgates Press Limited t/a DCR MachinesSME£1,639,650 †—Awarded

Contracts

Bid statistics published by the authority

BidsSMEVCSEValid bid range
1bids———

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

The Minister for the Cabinet Office acting through the Cabinet Office

Contracting authorityMinistry or any other national or federal authority, including their regional or local subdivisionsHealth 1 Horse Guards Road, London, UK, SW1A 2HQContact email, phone

Bidders & participating suppliers

1 commercial party on the notice

Official documents & specifications

Official links; attachments are not copied

No document links were published on the notice.