Removal Services · UK public procurement notice

SPD question 4A.1 - Not used

SPD question 4A.2 - Not used

For SPD question 4B.1 to 4B.4 - Not used

For SPD question 4B.5 It is a requirement of this contract that bidders hold, or can commit to obtain prior to the commencement of any subsequently awarded contract, the types and levels of insurance indicated below:

Employers Liability Insurance 5,000,000GBP

Public Liability Insurance 1,000,000GBP

For SPD question 4B.6 - The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) uses Creditsafe, an independent provider of online business credit reports, to assess the financial standing of tenderers. We highly recommend that tenderers review their financial performance on Creditsafe to understand their credit score rating which will be used by the SPCB to evaluate the financial standing of the tenderer and that they read the information about how that data is collected and used prior to submitting a tender. Information and the opportunity to run a free report can be found at www.creditsafe.com/products/business-cr… ↗

The SPCB requires tenderers to have a Creditsafe Risk Score of 40 or higher to demonstrate satisfactory financial standing. If a tenderer has a lower credit risk score than 40 on Creditsafe and has the backing of a parent company with a credit risk score of 40 or higher, then the provision of a parent company guarantee will be required prior to the award of any contract. If a tenderer has a lower credit risk score than 40 and cannot provide a parent company guarantee, they must submit evidence to support a stable an…

SPD question 4C.1 - Not used

For SPD question 4C.1.2 - Bidders will be required to provide examples that demonstrate that they have the relevant experience to deliver the services/supplies as described in part II.2.4 of the Contract Notice or the relevant section of the Site Notice. Any submission that does not demonstrate experience in delivering the services will be regarded as a fail and will not be considered further.

Please note that weightings have been applied to the subsection of 4C.1.2 as follows:

(i) 35% (ii) 20% (iii) 20% (iv) 25%.

Scores will be allocated according the following matrix:

0 Unacceptable - Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate previous experience relevant to this criterion.

1 Poor - Response is partially relevant but generally poor. The response shows some elements of relevance to the criterion but contains insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate previous relevant experience.

2 Acceptable - Response is relevant and acceptable. The response demonstrates broad previous experience but lack detail in some aspects.

3 Good - Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good amount of relevant experience.

4 Excellent - Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates thorough relevant experience.

SPD question 4C.2 - 4C.3 - Not used

For SPD question 4C.4 - if bidders intend to use a supply chain to deliver the requirements …