TenderlineUK
Procurement Intelligence
Official OCDS
Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure

Proactive Identification Care & Transfer (PICT) at UHP

Community health services
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: University Hospitals Plymouth: "Proactive Identification Care & Transfer (PICT) at UHP". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
Contracting AuthorityUniversity Hospitals PlymouthScope & CategoriesNot publishedSubmission Window
complete
No deadline published
Submission GatewayDirect notice routeLegal Basis & RegimeStandard procurementEstimated Value (exc. VAT)Not published
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: University Hospitals Plymouth
Market Analytics
View Authority Profile →
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for University Hospitals Plymouth. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Published-to-award variance
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Requires at least 5 comparable procedures
Competition Density
1Bids / Report
100% of reports have one bid
Supplier ConcentrationNo estimate
Insufficient attributable awardsNo concentration estimate available
Payment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Payment obligations depend on the applicable regime and contract. Consult the official documents.
Coverage: 4 active published awards; 4 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Published-to-award variance compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityUniversity Hospitals Plymouth
Procedure methodNot published
Procurement categoryNot published
Statuscomplete
Framework / DPSNot published
CompetitionNot published
Above thresholdNot published
Legal basisNot published
Tender period startsNot published
Clarification deadlineNot published
Electronic submissionNot published
Submission languagesNot published
Published14 Oct 2024, 16:50 BST
Last source update14 Oct 2024, 16:50 BST
Recurring procurementNot published
ClassificationCommunity health services
Delivery area
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-04abf5
What is being bought
The service to be implemented by Marie Curie in collaboration with UHP will enhance end-of-life care and alleviate pressure on hospital resources and provide better outcomes for patients at end of life. The service will expediate the improvement in end-of-life care with a particular emphasis on identification of patients that are nearing the end of their lives. This should result in helping establish people’s preferences and support earlier discharge or transfer to another care setting. In line with patient’s and family’s wishes.<br/>In coming to this decision the Trust considered the 5 key criteria above. These criteria are not weighted as they are equally important for this service. They clearly meet and in some elements exceed the requirements of this service.<br/><br/>The Key Criteria measures were<br/>1. Value For Money<br/>2. Quality & Innovation<br/>3. Integration, Collaboration & Service Sustainability<br/>4. Social Value<br/>5. Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice<br/><br/>Decision makers in this process included Director of Integrated Care, Partnerships and strategy. The Trust End of Life Lead Manager, Transformation Team, Procurement, Finance, Trust Management Board Executives and many more internal Stakeholders.<br/><br/>There were no conflict of interests or potential conflicts of interest in the decision-making process.
What changed
From the official release history
  1. Status changed to complete
    14 Oct 2024, 16:50 BST
  2. Official notice release published
    14 Oct 2024, 16:50 BST
  3. Buyer information updated
    14 Oct 2024, 16:50 BST
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
  • Lot 1 · #1
    Individual lot title not published
    cancelled
    Published valueNot published
    This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Contract award notice detailing the Trusts intentions to award this contract to Marie Curie. This contract has been awarded under the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award<br/>NHS Provider Selection Regime Most Suitable Provider award. This provider was considered against the 5 key criteria above. These criteria are not weighted as they are equally important for this service.
    Contract periodNot published
    EligibilityNot published
    Options / renewalNot published
Timeline
  1. Procedure published
    14 Oct 2024, 16:50 BST
  2. Award active
    Not published · Not published
  3. Contract active
    Signed 1 Oct 2024, 00:00 BST · £4,186,791
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards
Marie Curie
Not published · Not published · active
Contracts
Contract
£4,186,791 · signed 1 Oct 2024, 00:00 BST · active
Bid statistics
bids: 1 (lot 1)
Buyer and organisations in this procedure

University Hospitals Plymouth

Contracting authority GB-FTS-98702
View buyer profile
  • University Hospitals Plymouth
    buyer

    Derriford Road, Plymouth, UKK41, PL6 8DH
    +44 1752434915
  • Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution
    mediationBody

    70 Fleet Street, London, EC4Y 1EU
  • Marie Curie
    supplier

    00507597
    One Embassy Gardens, 8 Viaduct Gardens, London, SW11 7BW, Plymouth, UKK41, SW11 7BW
  • Public Procurement Review Service
    reviewBody

Documents (0)
Official links; attachments are not copied
No data
No linked documents are published
Related procedures (0)
No data
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published
No-engagement rationaleNot published
Procedure rationaleThe justification is set out below why the Trust chose to use the most suitable provider process without competition<br/><br/>• Existing part of the model being procured already supported by this provider, well embedded and working to deliver the required KPI/performance, risk to destabilisation if moving to a different provider.<br/>• Limited provider with specific palliative care staff mean the direct award pool is small and other known providers reengaged and this is not part of their strategy or business model so were not intending to bid should we have gone to direct award<br/>• This is the only provider whom would be able to embark in a social value/co-funded offer of a pump primed initiative- making them the most value for money provider we have evaluated what this would cost to do ourselves and it would be more expensive<br/>• This is a service we will be evaluating and future contract award on the basis of this three year ‘partnership/pilot’<br/>• Given section 29a need to implement at pace and working with a provider able to implement in one month reduces harm to patients<br/>• Social value- local employer, and contributing to wider benefits on evaluation to share with others, training and education