Tenderline / Tenders / National Infection and Sepsis Audit – Acute NHS …
Official UK procurement notice
National Infection and Sepsis Audit – Acute NHS settings
Authority: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (Public body)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe contract for the Infection and Sepsis Audit - Acute care settings (NISA-Acute) will initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England and Wales for a period of three years, at a maximum total budget of up to £ 1,146,300.00 excl VAT and £1,375,560.00 with VAT.
Bids exceeding these limits will be rejected.
All pricing submissions must be in regard to this 'core' value, and not inclusive of any extension costs or aspirational intent costs, i.e. Please only submit a cost schedule up to the maximum core value of £ 1,146,300.00 excl VAT and £1,375,560.00 with VAT.
The maximum budget ‘core’ value excludes the potential two year extension and aspirational intent as described in section 14.3 of Annex A - Service Specification.
Please note, there is no commitment by the Authority at this stage to include any of the below aspirational intent. Taking this aspirational intent into account, including the possibility that a contract extension may be offered for an additional 24 months, the potential ceiling value is £8,988,606.00 GBP including VAT.
This is a new national clinical audit for severe infection and sepsis in acute NHS hospital settings. The aim is to provide benchmarked infection and sepsis care data to identify variation and drive improvement over time.
Read the full description (2,972 more characters)
Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. While it is an unusual complication of developing an infection, it can be triggered by any infection. When people die from an infection, it is most commonly due to sepsis. Sepsis is complex and hard to diagnose, with no single test and symptoms that overlap with other conditions (NHS England Modern Service Framework, 2026)
Severe infections may lead to the development of sepsis, particularly in at-risk groups, and are one of the most common reasons for emergency admission to hospital.
Both infection and sepsis are major causes of morbidity and mortality in the UK, and costly to the NHS and wider economy:
In 2025 there were over 23,000 deaths involving sepsis (Office for National Statistics).
Patients and carers who we engaged with as part of specification development told us of long-term impacts that some sepsis survivors experience, from reduced mobility and cognitive difficulties, to loss of limbs or vision impairments.
Each year, the NHS in England spends over £1billion on sepsis care, and over £6.5billion on infection care. Wider economic costs are estimated at £10-15billion annually (York Health Economics Consortium, 2017).
1,300 clinical negligence claims were made regarding sepsis from 2020/21 to 2024/25, costing £65.3m in litigation. Most claims relate to delays and failures in treatment and diagnosis.
Several major healthcare initiatives have been launched to help improve care related to sepsis and severe infection, including:
NHS England’s sepsis Modern Service Framework (MSF), which aims to reduce death, life-threatening complications and long-term impact from sepsis and severe infection by at least 25% by 2035, as well as reducing health inequalities (published July 2026).
NHS England’s National Improvement Programme for ‘Optimising the acute management of sepsis’ (as part of the MSF activities).
The National Patient Safety Plan for NHS Wales 2026-2031, which includes sepsis care.
The UK Anti-Microbial Resistance (AMR) National Action Plan, which pledges to strengthen infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in health and social care settings
New NICE guidelines for recognition, diagnosis and early management of suspected sepsis, published in November 2025 (NG253-NG255)
Establishing the NISA-Acute audit is a key ambition of the NHS England sepsis MSF, and the audit will be expected to align closely with all the initiatives listed above.
The audit funders have selected ‘early stages of care’ as the initial priority for this audit because this is a critical point for effective severe infection management and the swift identification and treatment of sepsis. Prompt, effective treatment is vital to improving outcomes, and both Prevention of Future Death (PFD) reports and Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) investigations have highlighted opportunities to improve care in this area.
CPV: Health services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1Lot 1RenewalPublished value£7,490,505
- Value
- £7,490,505 exc. VAT · £8,988,606 inc. VAT
- Extensions
- Up to 2 years extension. A 5 year contract in total
What it takes to win
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add morePublished sub-criteria (24)
- LEADERSHIP — 5
- ENGAGING AND INVOLVING PATIENTS, CARERS AND THE PUBLIC — 8
- SUPPORTING HEALTHCARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT — 8
- HEALTHCARE PROVIDER ENGAGEMENT, PARTICIPATION AND SUPPORT — 8
- DATA ACQUISITION STRATEGY AND BURDEN — 12
- INFORMATION GOVERNANCE — 4
- DATA QUALITY ANALYSIS — 12
- USES OF THE DATA — 12
- PROGRAMME GOVERNANCE AND DELIVERY PLAN — 12
- RISK MANAGEMENT — 4
- LEADERSHIP — 5
- ENGAGING AND INVOLVING PATIENTS, CARERS AND THE PUBLIC — 8
- SUPPORTING HEALTHCARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT — 8
- HEALTHCARE PROVIDER ENGAGEMENT, PARTICIPATION AND SUPPORT — 8
- DATA ACQUISITION STRATEGY AND BURDEN — 12
- INFORMATION GOVERNANCE — 4
- DATA QUALITY ANALYSIS — 12
- USES OF THE DATA — 12
- PROGRAMME GOVERNANCE AND DELIVERY PLAN — 12
- RISK MANAGEMENT — 4
- COST & ALLOCATION OF BUDGET — 5
- COST & ALLOCATION OF BUDGET — 5
- SOCIAL VALUE — 10
- SOCIAL VALUE — 10
Published award criteria (24)
- LEADERSHIP — See ITT
- ENGAGING AND INVOLVING PATIENTS, CARERS AND THE PUBLIC — See ITT
- SUPPORTING HEALTHCARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT — See ITT
- HEALTHCARE PROVIDER ENGAGEMENT, PARTICIPATION AND SUPPORT — See ITT
- DATA ACQUISITION STRATEGY AND BURDEN — See ITT
- INFORMATION GOVERNANCE — See ITT
- DATA QUALITY ANALYSIS — See ITT
- USES OF THE DATA — See ITT
- PROGRAMME GOVERNANCE AND DELIVERY PLAN — See ITT
- RISK MANAGEMENT — See ITT
- COST & ALLOCATION OF BUDGET — See ITT
- SOCIAL VALUE — See ITT
- LEADERSHIP — See ITT
- ENGAGING AND INVOLVING PATIENTS, CARERS AND THE PUBLIC — See ITT
- SUPPORTING HEALTHCARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT — See ITT
- HEALTHCARE PROVIDER ENGAGEMENT, PARTICIPATION AND SUPPORT — See ITT
- DATA ACQUISITION STRATEGY AND BURDEN — See ITT
- INFORMATION GOVERNANCE — See ITT
- DATA QUALITY ANALYSIS — See ITT
- USES OF THE DATA — See ITT
- PROGRAMME GOVERNANCE AND DELIVERY PLAN — See ITT
- RISK MANAGEMENT — See ITT
- COST & ALLOCATION OF BUDGET — See ITT
- SOCIAL VALUE — See ITT
No conditions of participation were published on the notice; check the tender documents.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership buys Health services (CPV 8510) — and who usually turns up
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership’s own published record, next to the Greater London market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: sector page →
How the contest usually goes
Left: this authority. Right: the market where the work is delivered. Bids and award-vs-estimate pairs are per lot, from contested contracts only — direct awards report one bid by definition and are left out. Empty means nothing was published, not filled in from elsewhere.
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership
contract notices in 36 months: 22 in CPV 8510 · 24 in division 85 · 26 in all categories
Greater London · Health services (CPV 8510)
contract notices delivered in Greater London in 36 months: 472 in CPV 8510 (230 contested) · 2,141 in division 85 (1,204 contested) · the notice publishes no delivery location, so the authority’s registered region is used
robust · n=42 Awards in Greater London (CPV 8510, n=42 pairs) land a median at estimate: on this notice’s £7,490,505 that is about £7,490,505, middle half £7,160,923–£7,490,505 (quartiles from Greater London · CPV 8510). Context for a bid, not a recommended price.
Method and what to read with care
- Two columns, no blending. The authority column walks its own record only: notices in the 4-digit class, then the 2-digit division, then all categories (36 months, per lot, contested only), and as a last resort its 24-month row across all categories (per notice, every route). The market column is the notice’s primary delivery ITL1 × the same class, then division (36 months). Nothing is filled from the UK-wide class; an empty tile means the source published nothing usable.
- Per lot, contested only. Find a Tender publishes bid counts per lot; a seven-lot tender is seven contests. Procedures awarded without competition (limited / direct) are excluded from bids, price pairs and decision days — they report one bid by definition. Frameworks and DPS are a separate population from contracts (6–7 bids per lot against 2–4) and only the notice’s own kind is shown.
- Coverage. Roughly 40 % of notices publish a bid count; about half publish an ITL1 delivery location, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice has none (labelled). Award-vs-estimate pairs need a lot estimate, one active award on the lot, one canonical supplier and a gap under 60 %; about 30 % of pairs are exact matches (the buyer published the award at the estimate). n is on every figure; below 3 the tile is muted, never hidden.
- Pounds. The expected award applies the authority’s median movement (or the region’s, when the authority has fewer than 3 pairs) to this notice’s estimate; the middle half uses the region’s quartiles. A multi-lot notice publishes an envelope, so the movement is applied per lot, never to the total. A benchmark, not a recommended price.
- “Match” and “relevance” are model scores from the nightly matcher, not published facts. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- No (one-off requirement)
- First published
- 18 Sept 2026, 15:46 BST
- Last source update
- 18 Sept 2026, 15:46 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end — 14 Jan 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Authority reference
1025879250- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0775bcFind a Tender- Contract terms summary
- Payment will be made quarterly in arrears as described in the provider terms (Annex B). Disputed invoices will be dealt with as described in the provider terms (Annex B)
- Risks
Full descriptive details of these measures, as well as the mechanisms for invoking them can be found in section 14.3 of Annex A - Service Specification. All figures are inclusive of VAT: 1. Up to 24-month extension that mirrors the NCAPOP headline contract (Please refer to Annex J - NHSE_HQIP NCAPOP Contract REDACTED) more…
- up to £917,040.00 2. Expansion of the scope of the NISA-Acute audit and/or addition of further workstreams, e.g. to cover more patients or other aspects of patient care (the list below is not intended to be exhaustive)up to £2,1600,000.00 3. Addition of patient reported outcome measure (PROM) or patient reported experience measure (PREM) Up to £600,000.00 4. Transition to different models of data collection/outputs &/or operational methods/processes for the audit. This may include implementing new ways of working where opportunities emerge to leverage artificial intelligence tools to drive efficiency and reduce burden up to £631,080.00. 5. Extending specific service coverage to include privately funded care up to £360,000.00 6. Additions or enhancements to the service delivery of the project up to £1,200,000.00 7.Additional quality improvement initiatives either related to or linked with the project up to £720,000.00
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via Delta eSourcing- Expression of interest (EOI)
- —
- Tender submission deadline
- 27 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- 12 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Timeline
5 published dates · Europe/London- Tender notice publishedearlier today18 Sept 2026, 15:46 BST
- Clarification questions byin 24 days12 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Submission deadlinein 39 days27 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Award decision expected byin 118 days14 Jan 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 194 days1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Tender notice published18 Sept 2026, 15:46 BSTUK4
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Conflict of interest declarationNot published
Notices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender