TenderlineUK
Procurement Intelligence
Official OCDS
Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure

Gibfield White Land Development

Construction work
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: Torus62 Limited: "Gibfield White Land Development". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
Contracting AuthorityTorus62 LimitedScope & CategoriesNot publishedSubmission Window
complete
No deadline published
Submission GatewayDirect notice routeLegal Basis & RegimeStandard procurementEstimated Value (exc. VAT)Not published
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: Torus62 Limited
Market Analytics
View Authority Profile →
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for Torus62 Limited. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Published-to-award variance
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Requires at least 5 comparable procedures
Competition Density
15.4Bids / Report
20% of reports have one bid
Supplier ConcentrationNo estimate
Insufficient attributable awardsNo concentration estimate available
Payment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Payment obligations depend on the applicable regime and contract. Consult the official documents.
Coverage: 5 active published awards; 5 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Published-to-award variance compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityTorus62 Limited
Procedure methodNot published
Procurement categoryNot published
Statuscomplete
Framework / DPSNot published
CompetitionNot published
Above thresholdNot published
Legal basisNot published
Tender period startsNot published
Clarification deadlineNot published
Electronic submissionNot published
Submission languagesNot published
Published22 Dec 2023, 10:06 GMT
Last source update22 Dec 2023, 10:06 GMT
Recurring procurementNot published
ClassificationConstruction work
Delivery area
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-0421f2
What is being bought
Intention to award a Public Works contract under Regulation 32(2) (b) (iii) of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 for the development of a single site at Gibfield White Land in Atherton, Manchester. The Negotiated Procedure without Prior Publication is being followed and is justified under Regulation 32 (2) (b) (iii). A voluntary ex ante transparency notice was published prior to award.
What changed
From the official release history
  1. Official notice release published
    22 Dec 2023, 10:06 GMT
  2. Status changed to complete
    5 Dec 2023, 19:05 GMT
  3. Official notice release published
    5 Dec 2023, 19:05 GMT
  4. Buyer information updated
    5 Dec 2023, 19:05 GMT
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
  • Lot 1 · #1
    Individual lot title not published
    cancelled
    Published valueNot published
    This Notice confirms the contracting authority's award of a works contract using the negotiated procedure without prior publication, in accordance with Regulation 32 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. The contracting authority has entered into a Development Agreement with Northstone Development Limited, Company No. 11501341 (“Northstone”). The Development Agreement provides for the development 113 units by Northstone, comprising a mix of Rent to Buy, Affordable Rent & Social Rent properties. The works will commence in January 2024 and are intended to be complete by June 2026. The contract value is £22,617,074 excluding VAT. The works can only be provided by a particular economic operator for the following reason: protection of exclusive rights under Regulation 32(2)(b)(iii) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. A detailed explanation for the use of the negotiated procedure without prior publication is at Annex D. Additional information: This Contract Award Notice confirms the award a public works contract using the Negotiated Procedure without prior publication (Regulation 32 (2) (b) (iii)). The detailed explanation for the use of the negotiated procedure without prior publication is set out in Annex D.
    Contract periodNot published
    EligibilityNot published
    Options / renewalNot published
Timeline
  1. Procedure published
    22 Dec 2023, 10:06 GMT
  2. Award active
    Not published · Not published
  3. Contract active
    Signed 21 Dec 2023, 00:00 GMT · £22,617,074
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards
Northstone Development Limited
Not published · Not published · active
Contracts
Contract
£22,617,074 · signed 21 Dec 2023, 00:00 GMT · active
Bid statistics
bids: 1 (lot 1)
Buyer and organisations in this procedure

Torus62 Limited

Contracting authority GB-FTS-22716
View buyer profile
  • Torus62 Limited
    buyer

    Helene Central, 4 Corporation Street, St Helens, UKD, WA9 1LD
    +44 7718707048
  • High Court of England of Wales
    reviewBody

    Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
  • Northstone Development Limited
    supplier

    11501341
    Venus Building, 1 Old Park Lane, Manchester, UKD, M41 7HA
    +44 1616298200
Documents (0)
Official links; attachments are not copied
No data
No linked documents are published
Related procedures (0)
No data
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published
No-engagement rationaleNot published
Procedure rationaleThe works can only be provided by a particular economic operator for the following reason: protection of exclusive rights under Regulation 32 (2) (b) (iii) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. The contracting authority was approached by Peel L&P Environmental Holdings Limited, (“Peel”) regarding the freehold sale of the land at Gibfield, a site west of North Road, Atherton, Manchester, a site which was within Peel’s ownership and which it wished to transfer to the contracting authority for the development of 113 homes (“the Site”). Peel required the purchaser of the Site to appoint Northstone to carry out the development of the site. Peel and Northstone are part of the same group and have the same persons with significant control. Accordingly, it was a condition of the sale of land agreement between Peel and the contracting authority, that the development works at the Site would be undertaken by Northstone. An extract of the clause included in the sale of land agreement is at section VI.3 for transparency. Under Regulation 32(2)(b)(iii) of the Public Contract Regulations 2015, the contracting authority considered that the works could be supplied by only one economic operator, Northstone, as it held exclusive rights in relation to the development by virtue of its relationship with the land owner and as a condition of the sale of the Site that the contracting authority appointed Northstone to carry out the works. In accordance with Regulation 32(2)(b)(iii), the contracting authority considered that no reasonable alternative or substitute exists. There was no reasonable alternative to route to purchase the Site without it being a condition of sale for the contracting authority to appoint Northstone to undertake the development works. Peel held exclusive rights over the Site as the Site owner and therefore imposed conditions relating to the sale requiring the appointment of Northstone to carry out the development works at the Site. Peel was not willing to sell the Site to the contracting authority without this condition. The contracting authority considered that it would not be given the opportunity to purchase the Site without this condition of sale and the requirement to appoint Northstone as the developer to carry out the works. The contracting authority considered that there were no alternative viable sites for this development. The contracting authority further considered that the absence of competition in this case was not a result of artificial narrowing down of the parameters of the procurement by the contracting authority. This opportunity was presented to it by Peel and Northstone and the structure of the transaction and the design of the development at the Site was already determined by them at the time the opportunity was presented to the contracting authority.