Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 26 Feb 2026, 15:43 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Geodemographic Segmentation tools · UK public procurement notice

Authority: Manchester City Council (Local council)

ServicesBelow threshold
Planned pipeline value£50,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 yrsends 30 Apr 2029 · starts 1 May 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Manchester City Council currently uses a geodemographic segmentation tool to support analysis, insight, and service planning across multiple departments, including Performance, Research & Intelligence (PRI), Public Health, and Communications.

Segmentation data is used to:

  • Produce demographic and behavioural profiles for localities
  • Identify vulnerable or priority household types
  • Support targeted interventions, outreach and communication planning
  • Provide insight into groups that may be under‑represented in administrative datasets
  • Support work related to deprivation, cost‑of‑living impact analysis, inequalities, health needs assessments and digital inclusion
  • Inform strategic planning through ward‑level and locality‑level profiling

The Council is exploring the market to understand current products, functionality, data quality, integration options and licensing models, to help shape future procurement activity.

CPV: IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Manchester City Council buys IT services: consulting, software, internet (CPV 72), and who usually turns up

Manchester City Council’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: IT services: consulting, software, internet (CPV 72) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerManchester City Council · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 41 of 74 known-size awards · market: division 72 · North West England, n=505
55%37%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in North West England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 75 of 106 known-location awards · market: division 72 · North West England, n=647
71%15%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in North West England.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 25 decided notices · market: division 72 · North West England, n=50
83 days62 days

Half of these awards were announced within 83 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 32 of 86 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 72 · North West England, n=782
37%63%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer74 lots with bid counts · all categories
12% had one bid
The market74 lots with bid counts · division 72 · North West England
9% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid12% / 9%
Buyer: 9 of 74 lots with published bid counts. Market: 7 of 74 lots with published bid counts.
2–338% / 31%
Buyer: 28 of 74 lots with published bid counts. Market: 23 of 74 lots with published bid counts.
4–627% / 20%
Buyer: 20 of 74 lots with published bid counts. Market: 15 of 74 lots with published bid counts.
7+23% / 39%
Buyer: 17 of 74 lots with published bid counts. Market: 29 of 74 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer57 lots with estimate and award · all categories
25% below estimate
The market65 lots with estimate and award · division 72 · North West England
32% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate25% / 32%
Buyer: 14 of 57 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 21 of 65 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%63% / 51%
Buyer: 36 of 57 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 33 of 65 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate12% / 17%
Buyer: 7 of 57 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 11 of 65 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #136 monthsPublished estimate£50k
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 74 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet9% single-bid risk
Past bids on 74 similar lots
1 bid9%
7 of 74 similar past lots received 1 bid (9%).
2–331%
23 of 74 similar past lots received 2–3 (31%).
4–620%
15 of 74 similar past lots received 4–6 (20%).
7+39%
29 of 74 similar past lots received 7+ (39%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £50k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
26 Feb 2026, 15:43 GMT
Last source update
26 Feb 2026, 15:55 GMT
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-017528
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support
Delivery area
North West (UKD33)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-065d63 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

26 Feb 2026 → 1 May 2026 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published236 days ago
    26 Feb 2026, 15:43 GMT
  2. Market engagement220 days ago
    13 Mar 2026, 23:59 GMT

    The Council is using the e-business portal known as the Chest. Applicants will need to register their details at the following link www.the-chest.org.uk ↗ . Once registered, applicants will be emailed a log-in and password which will allow them to gain access to the documentation relating to this Preliminary Market Engagement.

    Manchester City Council is conducting a preliminary market engagement exercise to assess the capability of the geodemographic segmentation marketplace.

    The exercise will assist the Council gather insights in advance of a potential future procurement. Please note this is not a call for competition and Manchester City Council reserves the right not to proceed to procurement.

    We would like to invite you to attend a session between March-April 2026 where you can demonstrate your geodemographic segmentation solution. Please let us know of your intention to be included in the demonstrations by completing and submitting the 'Preliminary Market Engagement Questionnaire - Geodemographic Solutions' doc via the E-Procurement platform, CHEST.

    A briefing note outlining the demonstrations (and dates planned to undertake these) is provided below. Companies that have registered will also be required to submit a brief questionnaire, enabling the council to understand your capability in this space. This will be used for information purposes only.

    procontract.due-north.com/Advert ↗

  3. Contract starts173 days ago
    1 May 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

2 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 26 Feb 2026
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    26 Feb 2026, 15:43 GMT
    UK2
  2. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    26 Feb 2026, 15:55 GMT
    UK2
Published amendments (1)

updated chest link

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Manchester City Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PLNV-8798-LDMP Town Hall Extension, Manchester, North West, M60 2LAContact email

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure