← Back to search results

AwardedFind a Tender · award

Cotswold Water Cycle Study

Buyer: Cotswold District Council →

BuyerCotswold District Council
StatusAwarded
DeadlineNot published
ValueValue not published
Published5 Feb 2026

What is being bought

The Water Cycle Study to accompany the Local Plan Partial Update (LPPU) is now complete. Where applicable, the new WCS will draw on this, however the LPPU WCS was prepared over several years, so substantial sections would require revision, in particular because we would anticipate needing to assess the impact of development at a greater volume and number of settlements than the LPPU WCS

Delivery location

UKK1

Categories

Consulting services for water-supply and waste consultancy 71800000

Lot details

Lot 1

METHODOLOGY General approach The Water Cycle Study to accompany the Local Plan Partial Update (LPPU) is now complete. Where applicable, the new WCS will draw on this, however the LPPU WCS was prepared over several years, so substantial sections would require revision, in particular because we would anticipate needing to assess the impact of development at a greater volume and number of settlements than the LPPU WCS. A draft will be provided to the Council, and to key stakeholders (Thames Water, Severn Trent Water, Wessex Water, Bristol Water and the Environment Agency). One round of comments has been allowed for. Growth scenario A growth forecast will be prepared, to include the latest commitments and completions, and your proposed allocations. We anticipate we will need further information from neighbouring authorities where infrastructure is shared across boundaries. From an initial view of the study area this would need updated growth information from: • Cheltenham • Tewkesbury • Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy • South Gloucestershire • Stratford-on-Avon • Stroud • Swindon • Vale of White Horse • West Oxfordshire • Wiltshire • Wychavon In the interests of time, we recommend that CDC initiate this process in advance of the project starting in order to avoid delays in obtaining data. You have advised that the Council will be moving towards a preferred growth option when the study commences. If it is the case that there remain optional approaches which the Council are still assessing, we can include up to four growth scenarios within our assessment. We will adapt our growth spreadsheet so these scenarios can be turned on and off in order to generate the appropriate water demand forecasts we need in the various assessments. Water resources The final WRMPs will be reviewed and compared to the overall housing need. Should there be a discrepancy (which is likely given the recent NPPF changes) this will be discussed with the water company and their comments sought on whether the additional growth could be accommodated within their existing plans or whether there are any constraints on timing of growth until additional water resources can be developed. The analysis of a water efficiency standard for CDC will be further developed including the evidence to support a tighter target if required. Once the growth scenario is prepared, we will provide it to you for review and approval prior to proceeding with the WCS assessments. Water supply We will provide details of potential allocations to the water supply companies and request that they provide comments / RAG assessment of these sites. These will be collated and followed up where appropriate to understand any additional infrastructure required, constraints or implications for the phasing of sites. Wastewater network As in the water supply assessment we will request RAG assessments from the sewerage undertakers, alongside information contained in their Drainage and Wastewater Management Plan (DWMP). Storm overflows The LPPU WCS assessed storm overflow performance using data from 2020 to 2022. We will update the storm overflow assessment with the latest available data (up to 2024) and Environment Agency methodology (published in 2025) which now requires 5 years of data to be used where available. Wastewater treatment We will assess current and future headroom at each wastewater treatment works (WwTW). Where this assessment shows a WwTW is close to, or exceeding its permit limit, comments will be sought from the water company on whether there are any constraints to providing upgrades, or land that requires safeguarding in the Local Plan. This will be supported by information from the Drainage and Wastewater management Plan (DWMP). Water quality and environmental impact The EA's SIMCAT water quality modelling tool will be used to assess the impact of growth in the Local Plan period on water quality. A baseline scenario will be created using the existing model updated to the latest WwTW flow data and planned improvements at WwTWs. Future scenarios will then be created using the new growth forecast to simulate the predicted wastewater discharges at the end of the plan period. The following tests will then be carried out: • Could the development cause a greater than 10% deterioration in water quality? This objective is to ensure that all the environmental capacity is not taken up by one stage of development and there is sufficient capacity for future growth. • Could the development cause a deterioration in WFD class of any element assessed? This is a requirement of the Water Framework Directive to prevent a deterioration in class of individual contaminants. • Could the development alone prevent the receiving watercourse from reaching Good Ecological Status (GES) or Potential? Is GES possible with current technology or is GES technically possible after development with any potential WwTW upgrades. Cotswold District is covered by two EA SIMCAT models (Thames and Severn). If the Council has multiple growth scenarios to be tested, this, in combination with climate change testing, would increase the volume of work significantly if we were to test every option. We therefore propose that we test the preferred option and create a "worst case scenario" combining several of the scenarios. Should the water quality modelling indicate an issue that cannot be resolved by improving treatment processes, we may recommend that further water quality modelling is carried out in order to understand the limit for this catchment. An indicative fee for additional model runs is provided. We will undertake a screening exercise to identify protected sites (SACs, SPAs, SSSIs and Ramsar sites) that could be impacted by a deterioration in water quality. The water quality modelling results will be used to determine the predicted water quality in the waterbodies adjacent to these protected sites. These results can be used to inform the appropriate assessment of the plan's impact on protected habitats. Further model runs will be undertaken to test the future impact of climate change on the water quality modelling results. Odour and flood risk An odour screening assessment will be carried out using a simple buffer (800m) around each WwTW. This will identify potential allocations that may be at risk of nuisance odour. An assessment will also be made of the impact of additional wastewater discharge on downstream flood risk. A flood estimate will be made on the receiving watercourse. Where the additional flow from the treatment works makes up a significant proportion of the storm flow, then it is deemed that flow from the WwTW could increase flood risk.

Statuscancelled

Award criteria
price

What is included

ItemCategoryQuantity
1Not publishedNot published

Comparable-procurement analytics

Benchmarked against retained Find a Tender procedures with CPV division 71. The category anchor is Consulting services for water-supply and waste consultancy (71800000); this is a deliberately broad market comparator. The comparison is shown at several levels rather than pretending one company or region is always the best benchmark.

Comparison setProceduresReported bids per procedureNamed award suppliersPrice evidence
Market: CPV division 713,3543 median · 31.7 average (841 of 3,354 with a bid count)3.7 average (936 of 3,354 with named award suppliers)Not published
Same buyer11 median · 1 average (1 of 1 with a bid count)1 average (1 of 1 with named award suppliers)Not published
Delivery region: UKK1181.5 median · 5.5 average (4 of 18 with a bid count)1.3 average (4 of 18 with named award suppliers)Not published

“Reported bids” is an official aggregate, sometimes reported per lot; it is the closest available competition measure. “Named award suppliers” are winners, not all applicants.

Price-outcome signal

Not enough comparable procedures currently publish both a GBP tender value and a usable lowest-valid-bid value to calculate a responsible price-reduction benchmark. Tenderline deliberately does not infer a saving from named award suppliers or from missing award values.

Procurement strategy & market signals

Framework agreementNot published
Dynamic purchasing systemNot published
Competitive procurementNot published
Recurring requirementNot published
Procurement method rationaleAwarded through the SEWTAPS framework (SEWTAPS-2025.02366)
Rationale classificationsThe procurement falls outside the scope of application of the directive
Special regimeNot published
Covered byGPA
Submission policyNot published
Selection criteriaNot published
Risk detailsNot published

Planning & early market engagement

BudgetNot published
No-engagement rationaleNot published
Planning documents0
Planning milestones0

No planning milestones published.

Related procurements

No linked framework, prior procurement or reprocurement published.

Awards

Contracts

010273-2026-1

Statusactive
Value£47,750

Documents & submission route

No documents are published in the current source record.

Source data inventory

Diagnostic view. “Not published” means this current release does not provide a value.

OCIDocds-h6vhtk-06479e
Latest release ID010273-2026
Latest release timestampThu Feb 05 2026 09:45:21 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
Sourcefind-a-tender
Official notice URLNot published
Tender statuscomplete
Procurement methodlimited
Procurement method detailsAward procedure without prior publication of a call for competition
Main procurement categoryservices
Above thresholdNot published
Legal basis32014L0024
Tender period: startNot published
Tender period: endNot published
Expression of interest deadlineNot published
Enquiry deadlineNot published
Award period: startNot published
Award period: endNot published
Submission method detailsNot published
Submission languagesNot published
Electronic catalogue policyNot published
Total tender valueNot published
Tender lots in source1
Tender items in source1
Tender documents in source0
Awards in latest release1
Contracts in latest release1
Parties in latest release3

Notice history

DateEventReference
5 Feb 2026award, contract010273-2026

All source data

Unmodified official OCDS data retained by Tenderline for this procurement process.

Complete current OCDS release JSON
{
  "id": "010273-2026",
  "tag": [
    "award",
    "contract"
  ],
  "bids": {
    "statistics": [
      {
        "id": "1",
        "value": 1,
        "measure": "bids",
        "relatedLot": "1"
      }
    ]
  },
  "date": "2026-02-05T09:45:21Z",
  "ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-06479e",
  "buyer": {
    "id": "GB-FTS-172627",
    "name": "Cotswold District Council"
  },
  "awards": [
    {
      "id": "010273-2026-1",
      "status": "active",
      "suppliers": [
        {
          "id": "GB-COH-3246693",
          "name": "Jeremy Benn Associates Ltd (trading name JBA Consulting)"
        }
      ],
      "relatedLots": [
        "1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "tender": {
    "id": "ocds-h6vhtk-06479e",
    "lots": [
      {
        "id": "1",
        "status": "cancelled",
        "hasOptions": false,
        "description": "METHODOLOGY\nGeneral approach\nThe Water Cycle Study to accompany the Local Plan Partial Update (LPPU) is now complete. Where applicable, the new WCS will draw on this, however the LPPU WCS was prepared over several years, so substantial sections would require revision, in particular because we would anticipate needing to assess the impact of development at a greater volume and number of settlements than the LPPU WCS.   \nA draft will be provided to the Council, and to key stakeholders (Thames Water, Severn Trent Water, Wessex Water, Bristol Water and the Environment Agency). One round of comments has been allowed for.\nGrowth scenario\nA growth forecast will be prepared, to include the latest commitments and completions, and your proposed allocations. We anticipate we will need further information from neighbouring authorities where infrastructure is shared across boundaries. From an initial view of the study area this would need updated growth information from:\n•\tCheltenham\n•\tTewkesbury\n•\tGloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy\n•\tSouth Gloucestershire\n•\tStratford-on-Avon\n•\tStroud\n•\tSwindon\n•\tVale of White Horse\n•\tWest Oxfordshire\n•\tWiltshire\n•\tWychavon\nIn the interests of time, we recommend that CDC initiate this process in advance of the project starting in order to avoid delays in obtaining data. \nYou have advised that the Council will be moving towards a preferred growth option when the study commences. If it is the case that there remain optional approaches which the Council are still assessing, we can include up to four growth scenarios within our assessment. We will adapt our growth spreadsheet so these scenarios can be turned on and off in order to generate the appropriate water demand forecasts we need in the various assessments.\nWater resources\nThe final WRMPs will be reviewed and compared to the overall housing need. Should there be a discrepancy (which is likely given the recent NPPF changes) this will be discussed with the water company and their comments sought on whether the additional growth could be accommodated within their existing plans or whether there are any constraints on timing of growth until additional water resources can be developed.\nThe analysis of a water efficiency standard for CDC will be further developed including the evidence to support a tighter target if required.\nOnce the growth scenario is prepared, we will provide it to you for review and approval prior to proceeding with the WCS assessments. \nWater supply\nWe will provide details of potential allocations to the water supply companies and request that they provide comments / RAG assessment of these sites. These will be collated and followed up where appropriate to understand any additional infrastructure required, constraints or implications for the phasing of sites.\nWastewater network\nAs in the water supply assessment we will request RAG assessments from the sewerage undertakers, alongside information contained in their Drainage and Wastewater Management Plan (DWMP).\nStorm overflows\nThe LPPU WCS assessed storm overflow performance using data from 2020 to 2022. We will update the storm overflow assessment with the latest available data (up to 2024) and Environment Agency methodology (published in 2025) which now requires 5 years of data to be used where available.\nWastewater treatment\nWe will assess current and future headroom at each wastewater treatment works (WwTW). Where this assessment shows a WwTW is close to, or exceeding its permit limit, comments will be sought from the water company on whether there are any constraints to providing upgrades, or land that requires safeguarding in the Local Plan. This will be supported by information from the Drainage and Wastewater management Plan (DWMP).\nWater quality and environmental impact\nThe EA's SIMCAT water quality modelling tool will be used to assess the impact of growth in the Local Plan period on water quality. A baseline scenario will be created using the existing model updated to the latest WwTW flow data and planned improvements at WwTWs. Future scenarios will then be created using the new growth forecast to simulate the predicted wastewater discharges at the end of the plan period. The following tests will then be carried out:\n•\tCould the development cause a greater than 10% deterioration in water quality? This objective is to ensure that all the environmental capacity is not taken up by one stage of development and there is sufficient capacity for future growth.\n•\tCould the development cause a deterioration in WFD class of any element assessed?  This is a requirement of the Water Framework Directive to prevent a deterioration in class of individual contaminants.\n•\tCould the development alone prevent the receiving watercourse from reaching Good Ecological Status (GES) or Potential? Is GES possible with current technology or is GES technically possible after development with any potential WwTW upgrades.\nCotswold District is covered by two EA SIMCAT models (Thames and Severn). If the Council has multiple growth scenarios to be tested, this, in combination with climate change testing, would increase the volume of work significantly if we were to test every option. We therefore propose that we test the preferred option and create a \"worst case scenario\" combining several of the scenarios. \nShould the water quality modelling indicate an issue that cannot be resolved by improving treatment processes, we may recommend that further water quality modelling is carried out in order to understand the limit for this catchment. An indicative fee for additional model runs is provided.\nWe will undertake a screening exercise to identify protected sites (SACs, SPAs, SSSIs and Ramsar sites) that could be impacted by a deterioration in water quality. The water quality modelling results will be used to determine the predicted water quality in the waterbodies adjacent to these protected sites. These results can be used to inform the appropriate assessment of the plan's impact on protected habitats.\nFurther model runs will be undertaken to test the future impact of climate change on the water quality modelling results.\nOdour and flood risk\nAn odour screening assessment will be carried out using a simple buffer (800m) around each WwTW. This will identify potential allocations that may be at risk of nuisance odour. An assessment will also be made of the impact of additional wastewater discharge on downstream flood risk. A flood estimate will be made on the receiving watercourse. Where the additional flow from the treatment works makes up a significant proportion of the storm flow, then it is deemed that flow from the WwTW could increase flood risk.",
        "awardCriteria": {
          "criteria": [
            {
              "type": "price"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    ],
    "items": [
      {
        "id": "1",
        "relatedLot": "1",
        "deliveryAddresses": [
          {
            "region": "UKK1"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "title": "Cotswold Water Cycle Study",
    "status": "complete",
    "coveredBy": [
      "GPA"
    ],
    "legalBasis": {
      "id": "32014L0024",
      "scheme": "CELEX"
    },
    "description": "The Water Cycle Study to accompany the Local Plan Partial Update (LPPU) is now complete. Where applicable, the new WCS will draw on this, however the LPPU WCS was prepared over several years, so substantial sections would require revision, in particular because we would anticipate needing to assess the impact of development at a greater volume and number of settlements than the LPPU WCS",
    "classification": {
      "id": "71800000",
      "scheme": "CPV",
      "description": "Consulting services for water-supply and waste consultancy"
    },
    "procurementMethod": "limited",
    "mainProcurementCategory": "services",
    "procurementMethodDetails": "Award procedure without prior publication of a call for competition",
    "procurementMethodRationale": "Awarded through the SEWTAPS framework (SEWTAPS-2025.02366)",
    "procurementMethodRationaleClassifications": [
      {
        "id": "D_OUTSIDE_SCOPE",
        "scheme": "TED_PT_AWARD_CONTRACT_WITHOUT_CALL",
        "description": "The procurement falls outside the scope of application of the directive"
      }
    ]
  },
  "parties": [
    {
      "id": "GB-FTS-172627",
      "name": "Cotswold District Council",
      "roles": [
        "buyer"
      ],
      "address": {
        "region": "UKK13",
        "locality": "Cirencester",
        "postalCode": "GL71PX",
        "countryName": "United Kingdom",
        "streetAddress": "Trinity Road"
      },
      "details": {
        "url": "https://www.cotswold.gov.uk/",
        "classifications": [
          {
            "id": "REGIONAL_AUTHORITY",
            "scheme": "TED_CA_TYPE",
            "description": "Regional or local authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "01",
            "scheme": "COFOG",
            "description": "General public services"
          }
        ]
      },
      "identifier": {
        "legalName": "Cotswold District Council",
        "noIdentifierRationale": "notOnAnyRegister"
      },
      "contactPoint": {
        "name": "Fred Shetliffe",
        "email": "freddie.shetliffe@publicagroup.uk"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "GB-COH-3246693",
      "name": "Jeremy Benn Associates Ltd (trading name JBA Consulting)",
      "roles": [
        "supplier"
      ],
      "address": {
        "region": "UK",
        "locality": "Skipton",
        "countryName": "United Kingdom"
      },
      "details": {
        "scale": "sme"
      },
      "identifier": {
        "id": "3246693",
        "scheme": "GB-COH",
        "legalName": "Jeremy Benn Associates Ltd (trading name JBA Consulting)"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "GB-FTS-84398",
      "name": "Cotswold District Council",
      "roles": [
        "reviewBody"
      ],
      "address": {
        "locality": "Cirencester",
        "countryName": "United Kingdom"
      },
      "identifier": {
        "legalName": "Cotswold District Council"
      }
    }
  ],
  "language": "en",
  "contracts": [
    {
      "id": "010273-2026-1",
      "value": {
        "amount": 47750,
        "currency": "GBP"
      },
      "status": "active",
      "awardID": "010273-2026-1",
      "dateSigned": "2026-01-06T00:00:00Z"
    }
  ],
  "initiationType": "tender"
}
Complete JSON history (1 releases)
5 Feb 2026 · 010273-2026 · award, contract
{
  "id": "010273-2026",
  "tag": [
    "award",
    "contract"
  ],
  "bids": {
    "statistics": [
      {
        "id": "1",
        "value": 1,
        "measure": "bids",
        "relatedLot": "1"
      }
    ]
  },
  "date": "2026-02-05T09:45:21Z",
  "ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-06479e",
  "buyer": {
    "id": "GB-FTS-172627",
    "name": "Cotswold District Council"
  },
  "awards": [
    {
      "id": "010273-2026-1",
      "status": "active",
      "suppliers": [
        {
          "id": "GB-COH-3246693",
          "name": "Jeremy Benn Associates Ltd (trading name JBA Consulting)"
        }
      ],
      "relatedLots": [
        "1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "tender": {
    "id": "ocds-h6vhtk-06479e",
    "lots": [
      {
        "id": "1",
        "status": "cancelled",
        "hasOptions": false,
        "description": "METHODOLOGY\nGeneral approach\nThe Water Cycle Study to accompany the Local Plan Partial Update (LPPU) is now complete. Where applicable, the new WCS will draw on this, however the LPPU WCS was prepared over several years, so substantial sections would require revision, in particular because we would anticipate needing to assess the impact of development at a greater volume and number of settlements than the LPPU WCS.   \nA draft will be provided to the Council, and to key stakeholders (Thames Water, Severn Trent Water, Wessex Water, Bristol Water and the Environment Agency). One round of comments has been allowed for.\nGrowth scenario\nA growth forecast will be prepared, to include the latest commitments and completions, and your proposed allocations. We anticipate we will need further information from neighbouring authorities where infrastructure is shared across boundaries. From an initial view of the study area this would need updated growth information from:\n•\tCheltenham\n•\tTewkesbury\n•\tGloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy\n•\tSouth Gloucestershire\n•\tStratford-on-Avon\n•\tStroud\n•\tSwindon\n•\tVale of White Horse\n•\tWest Oxfordshire\n•\tWiltshire\n•\tWychavon\nIn the interests of time, we recommend that CDC initiate this process in advance of the project starting in order to avoid delays in obtaining data. \nYou have advised that the Council will be moving towards a preferred growth option when the study commences. If it is the case that there remain optional approaches which the Council are still assessing, we can include up to four growth scenarios within our assessment. We will adapt our growth spreadsheet so these scenarios can be turned on and off in order to generate the appropriate water demand forecasts we need in the various assessments.\nWater resources\nThe final WRMPs will be reviewed and compared to the overall housing need. Should there be a discrepancy (which is likely given the recent NPPF changes) this will be discussed with the water company and their comments sought on whether the additional growth could be accommodated within their existing plans or whether there are any constraints on timing of growth until additional water resources can be developed.\nThe analysis of a water efficiency standard for CDC will be further developed including the evidence to support a tighter target if required.\nOnce the growth scenario is prepared, we will provide it to you for review and approval prior to proceeding with the WCS assessments. \nWater supply\nWe will provide details of potential allocations to the water supply companies and request that they provide comments / RAG assessment of these sites. These will be collated and followed up where appropriate to understand any additional infrastructure required, constraints or implications for the phasing of sites.\nWastewater network\nAs in the water supply assessment we will request RAG assessments from the sewerage undertakers, alongside information contained in their Drainage and Wastewater Management Plan (DWMP).\nStorm overflows\nThe LPPU WCS assessed storm overflow performance using data from 2020 to 2022. We will update the storm overflow assessment with the latest available data (up to 2024) and Environment Agency methodology (published in 2025) which now requires 5 years of data to be used where available.\nWastewater treatment\nWe will assess current and future headroom at each wastewater treatment works (WwTW). Where this assessment shows a WwTW is close to, or exceeding its permit limit, comments will be sought from the water company on whether there are any constraints to providing upgrades, or land that requires safeguarding in the Local Plan. This will be supported by information from the Drainage and Wastewater management Plan (DWMP).\nWater quality and environmental impact\nThe EA's SIMCAT water quality modelling tool will be used to assess the impact of growth in the Local Plan period on water quality. A baseline scenario will be created using the existing model updated to the latest WwTW flow data and planned improvements at WwTWs. Future scenarios will then be created using the new growth forecast to simulate the predicted wastewater discharges at the end of the plan period. The following tests will then be carried out:\n•\tCould the development cause a greater than 10% deterioration in water quality? This objective is to ensure that all the environmental capacity is not taken up by one stage of development and there is sufficient capacity for future growth.\n•\tCould the development cause a deterioration in WFD class of any element assessed?  This is a requirement of the Water Framework Directive to prevent a deterioration in class of individual contaminants.\n•\tCould the development alone prevent the receiving watercourse from reaching Good Ecological Status (GES) or Potential? Is GES possible with current technology or is GES technically possible after development with any potential WwTW upgrades.\nCotswold District is covered by two EA SIMCAT models (Thames and Severn). If the Council has multiple growth scenarios to be tested, this, in combination with climate change testing, would increase the volume of work significantly if we were to test every option. We therefore propose that we test the preferred option and create a \"worst case scenario\" combining several of the scenarios. \nShould the water quality modelling indicate an issue that cannot be resolved by improving treatment processes, we may recommend that further water quality modelling is carried out in order to understand the limit for this catchment. An indicative fee for additional model runs is provided.\nWe will undertake a screening exercise to identify protected sites (SACs, SPAs, SSSIs and Ramsar sites) that could be impacted by a deterioration in water quality. The water quality modelling results will be used to determine the predicted water quality in the waterbodies adjacent to these protected sites. These results can be used to inform the appropriate assessment of the plan's impact on protected habitats.\nFurther model runs will be undertaken to test the future impact of climate change on the water quality modelling results.\nOdour and flood risk\nAn odour screening assessment will be carried out using a simple buffer (800m) around each WwTW. This will identify potential allocations that may be at risk of nuisance odour. An assessment will also be made of the impact of additional wastewater discharge on downstream flood risk. A flood estimate will be made on the receiving watercourse. Where the additional flow from the treatment works makes up a significant proportion of the storm flow, then it is deemed that flow from the WwTW could increase flood risk.",
        "awardCriteria": {
          "criteria": [
            {
              "type": "price"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    ],
    "items": [
      {
        "id": "1",
        "relatedLot": "1",
        "deliveryAddresses": [
          {
            "region": "UKK1"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "title": "Cotswold Water Cycle Study",
    "status": "complete",
    "coveredBy": [
      "GPA"
    ],
    "legalBasis": {
      "id": "32014L0024",
      "scheme": "CELEX"
    },
    "description": "The Water Cycle Study to accompany the Local Plan Partial Update (LPPU) is now complete. Where applicable, the new WCS will draw on this, however the LPPU WCS was prepared over several years, so substantial sections would require revision, in particular because we would anticipate needing to assess the impact of development at a greater volume and number of settlements than the LPPU WCS",
    "classification": {
      "id": "71800000",
      "scheme": "CPV",
      "description": "Consulting services for water-supply and waste consultancy"
    },
    "procurementMethod": "limited",
    "mainProcurementCategory": "services",
    "procurementMethodDetails": "Award procedure without prior publication of a call for competition",
    "procurementMethodRationale": "Awarded through the SEWTAPS framework (SEWTAPS-2025.02366)",
    "procurementMethodRationaleClassifications": [
      {
        "id": "D_OUTSIDE_SCOPE",
        "scheme": "TED_PT_AWARD_CONTRACT_WITHOUT_CALL",
        "description": "The procurement falls outside the scope of application of the directive"
      }
    ]
  },
  "parties": [
    {
      "id": "GB-FTS-172627",
      "name": "Cotswold District Council",
      "roles": [
        "buyer"
      ],
      "address": {
        "region": "UKK13",
        "locality": "Cirencester",
        "postalCode": "GL71PX",
        "countryName": "United Kingdom",
        "streetAddress": "Trinity Road"
      },
      "details": {
        "url": "https://www.cotswold.gov.uk/",
        "classifications": [
          {
            "id": "REGIONAL_AUTHORITY",
            "scheme": "TED_CA_TYPE",
            "description": "Regional or local authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "01",
            "scheme": "COFOG",
            "description": "General public services"
          }
        ]
      },
      "identifier": {
        "legalName": "Cotswold District Council",
        "noIdentifierRationale": "notOnAnyRegister"
      },
      "contactPoint": {
        "name": "Fred Shetliffe",
        "email": "freddie.shetliffe@publicagroup.uk"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "GB-COH-3246693",
      "name": "Jeremy Benn Associates Ltd (trading name JBA Consulting)",
      "roles": [
        "supplier"
      ],
      "address": {
        "region": "UK",
        "locality": "Skipton",
        "countryName": "United Kingdom"
      },
      "details": {
        "scale": "sme"
      },
      "identifier": {
        "id": "3246693",
        "scheme": "GB-COH",
        "legalName": "Jeremy Benn Associates Ltd (trading name JBA Consulting)"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "GB-FTS-84398",
      "name": "Cotswold District Council",
      "roles": [
        "reviewBody"
      ],
      "address": {
        "locality": "Cirencester",
        "countryName": "United Kingdom"
      },
      "identifier": {
        "legalName": "Cotswold District Council"
      }
    }
  ],
  "language": "en",
  "contracts": [
    {
      "id": "010273-2026-1",
      "value": {
        "amount": 47750,
        "currency": "GBP"
      },
      "status": "active",
      "awardID": "010273-2026-1",
      "dateSigned": "2026-01-06T00:00:00Z"
    }
  ],
  "initiationType": "tender"
}