Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 5 Nov 2026, 14:36 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Corporate Information Audiovisual Asset Management System

Authority: Science Museum Group (Central government)

Goods
Sectors: Software Packages & ERP (48)IT Services & Software (72) Delivery: Delivery location not published
Planned pipeline value£165,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 7 Dec 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 4 moends 31 Jul 2027 · starts 1 Apr 2027
Notice summaryFrom the published notice

High Level Requirements. The requirement is for an internal (non-public facing) Asset Management System that colleagues across the group can use to search, manage and access audiovisual materials that have been created or commissioned by the Science Museum Group (Corporate Records).

What is being bought

Published requirement description

High Level Requirements

The Science Museum Group comprises of a group of UK institutions:

  • Science Museum, London
  • Science & Industry Museum, Manchester
  • National Science & Media Museum, Bradford
  • National Railway Museum, York
  • Locomotion, Shildon
  • Science and Innovation Park, Wroughton

The requirement is for an internal (non-public facing) Asset Management System that colleagues across the group can use to search, manage and access audiovisual materials that have been created or commissioned by the Science Museum Group (Corporate Records).

These materials fall into three major categories, each which has its own use cases and workflows.

  • Video Production. At the end of a video project, whether it is a video for one of our YouTube channels or video content for our galleries and exhibitions, the deliverables (H.264, Apple ProRes 444), the edit project (ZIP, TAR) and camera rushes will be stored for long-term reference. The expectation is that the original files will be accessed very infrequently and, in most cases, can be managed via low bitrate “access copies”.
  • Oral Histories. This is a collection of interviews on a specific topic, normally audio only, but could include video. The management of such content requires consideration for time-based metadata (topics covered) as well as versioning as we may often have to produce a redacted version of an interview to remove Personally Identifiable Information.
  • Complex Digital Objects. This can cover multiple scenarios, but the key one would be the storage and management of multi-file multimedia deliverables such as Macromedia Director or Unity Projects that are used throughout the museums. These are large archive packages, such as ZIP or TAR, or disc images like ISO, IMG or VDHX.

Alongside these content types would be general document storage – Microsoft office files, Adobe Acrobat – and potentially design documents – high resolution stills photography, Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator working files.

The chosen system must demonstrate support for:

  • Audiovisual materials encoded using a variety of codecs, including camera files, with technical metadata extraction and “access copy” creation.
  • Metadata support for hierarchical structured collections, time-based logging and building relationships between assets and titles.
  • Ability to integrate with third-party tools and export assets with all associated metadata to a defined metadata standard.
  • Ability to share a selection of materials with a third party for a limited time with limited permissions.
  • Storage management based around 3:2:1:1:0 methodology, including the ability to schedule fixity checking across the content held.
  • Support for multiple storage technologies including cloud and LTO tape.

CPV: Data management services · Electronic data management (EDM) · Information systems

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Science Museum Group buys Database systems (CPV 4861), and who usually turns up

Science Museum Group’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Database systems (CPV 4861) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerScience Museum Group · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 20 of 33 known-size awards · market: CPV 4861 · UK-wide, n=41
61%22%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 5 of 13 known-location awards · market: CPV 4861 · UK-wide, n=27
38%33%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 20 decided notices · market: division 48 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=28
33 days63 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 33 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 5 of 73 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 4861 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=7
7%71%

Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer27 lots with bid counts · all categories
11% had one bid
The market53 lots with bid counts · division 48 · Greater London (authority’s region)
21% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid11% / 21%
Buyer: 3 of 27 lots with published bid counts. Market: 11 of 53 lots with published bid counts.
2–319% / 21%
Buyer: 5 of 27 lots with published bid counts. Market: 11 of 53 lots with published bid counts.
4–622% / 42%
Buyer: 6 of 27 lots with published bid counts. Market: 22 of 53 lots with published bid counts.
7+48% / 17%
Buyer: 13 of 27 lots with published bid counts. Market: 9 of 53 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer70 lots with estimate and award · all categories
46% below estimate
The market33 lots with estimate and award · division 48 · Greater London (authority’s region)
61% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate46% / 61%
Buyer: 32 of 70 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 20 of 33 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%27% / 15%
Buyer: 19 of 70 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 5 of 33 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate27% / 24%
Buyer: 19 of 70 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 8 of 33 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 48614 monthsPublished estimate£165k
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 53 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet21% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 53 similar lots
1 bid21%
11 of 53 similar past lots received 1 bid (21%).
2–321%
11 of 53 similar past lots received 2–3 (21%).
4–642%
22 of 53 similar past lots received 4–6 (42%).
7+17%
9 of 53 similar past lots received 7+ (17%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £165k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder contracts appear on the Retender Radar, not yet in these figures.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
5 Nov 2026, 14:36 GMT
Last source update
5 Nov 2026, 14:36 GMT
Authority reference
SCM4288M
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-105279
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Data management servicesElectronic data management (EDM)Information systems
Delivery area
Not published
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-07b56c Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

5 Nov 2026 → 1 Apr 2027 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published4h ago
    5 Nov 2026, 14:36 GMT
  2. Today
    5 Nov 2026
  3. Market engagementin 25 days
    30 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT

    Based on the high-level requirements listed in the notice, please provide any relevant information about your proposed solution, including case studies, product literature and video demonstrations of the user interface / experience, to [email protected], with the subject line “Corporate Information AV Asset Management System”.

    A complete requirements document and MoSCoW scorecard will be made available when the tender is published.

  4. Tender notice expectedin 32 days
    7 Dec 2026, 23:59 GMT
  5. Contract startsin 146 days
    1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    5 Nov 2026, 14:36 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Science Museum Group

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PDTR-3338-MNPG The Science Museum, London, London, SW7 2DDContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure