Consulting Room Alterations at the Everleigh Centre, Swindon

Submitted Price (pricing schedule as shown in Annex F) 60% Sub-total 60% Tender Award Questions Section 6 6.1.1 Implementation 10% 6.1.2 Project Reporting 5% 6.1.3 Contract Management 10% 6.1.4 Problem Solving 5% 6.1.5 Social Value 10% Sub-total 40% Total 100% Evaluation Criteria - Price elements Price elements will be judged using the following methodology: The lowest price for a response which meets the pass criteria shall score 10. All other bids shall be scored on a pro rata basis in relation to the lowest price. For example - Bid 1 £100,000 scores 10, Bid 2 £120,000 differential £20,000 or 20% remove 20% from price scores 8, Bid 3 £150,000 differential £50,000 remove 50% from price scores 5, Bid 4 £175,000 differential £75,000 remove 75% from price scores 2.5. The lowest score possible is 0. All scores are then subjected to a multiplier e.g. if price has a scoring criterion of 70%, the multiplier will be 7. Award Evaluation Criteria - Non-price elements Non-Price elements will be judged on a score from 0 to 5, which shall be subjected to a multiplier so criteria worth 20% will have a 0-5 score and a multiplier of 4. The 0-5 score shall be based on: 0 The Question is not answered or the response is completely unacceptable. i.e. does not meet the minimum requirement or it has completely missed the point of the question. 1 Very poor response and not acceptable - fails to meet the minimum requirement/standard, requires major revision to make it acceptable. Only partially answers the requirement, with major deficiencies and little relevant detail proposed. 2 Poor response only partially satisfying requirement/standard, with deficiencies apparent. Some useful evidence provided but response falls well short of minimum requirements. 3 Response is acceptable and meets minimum requirement but remains basic and could have been expanded upon. Response is sufficient but does not inspire. Good probability of success, weaknesses can be readily corrected. 4 Response meets our expected requirement/standard and exceeds minimum expectations, including as level of detail, which adds value to the bid. No significant weaknesses noted. 5 Excellent response. Comprehensive and useful. No weaknesses noted. The response includes a full description of techniques and measurements to be employed.