TenderlineUK
Procurement Intelligence
Official OCDS
Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure

AULA Product Development Resource

No classification published
Location not published
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: Coventry University: "AULA Product Development Resource". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
Contracting AuthorityCoventry UniversityScope & CategoriesNot publishedSubmission Window
complete
No deadline published
Submission GatewayDirect notice routeLegal Basis & RegimeStandard procurementEstimated Value (exc. VAT)Not published
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: Coventry University
Market Analytics
View Authority Profile →
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for Coventry University. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Published-to-award variance
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Requires at least 5 comparable procedures
Competition Density
9.5Bids / Report
0% of reports have one bid
Supplier ConcentrationHigh Concentration
COPYRIGHT LICENSING AGENCY LIMITED(THE)Top vendor: 100% of attributable value
Payment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Payment obligations depend on the applicable regime and contract. Consult the official documents.
Coverage: 131 active published awards; 2 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Published-to-award variance compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Historical Awarded Suppliers With This Authority:
Supplier NameHistoric AwardsAttributable GBP Value
COPYRIGHT LICENSING AGENCY LIMITED(THE)1 win£217,896
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityCoventry University
Procedure methodNot published
Procurement categoryNot published
Statuscomplete
Framework / DPSNot published
CompetitionNot published
Above thresholdNot published
Legal basisNot published
Tender period startsNot published
Clarification deadlineNot published
Electronic submissionNot published
Submission languagesNot published
Published4 Aug 2025, 17:08 BST
Last source update4 Aug 2025, 17:08 BST
Recurring procurementNot published
ClassificationNot published
Delivery areaLocation not published
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-05120a
What is being bought
Contractor resource to support the University's AULA VLE Platform.
What changed
From the official release history
  1. Official notice release published
    4 Aug 2025, 17:08 BST
  2. Official notice release published
    15 May 2025, 16:52 BST
  3. Status changed to complete
    13 May 2025, 13:57 BST
  4. Official notice release published
    13 May 2025, 13:57 BST
  5. Buyer information updated
    13 May 2025, 13:57 BST
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
  • Lot 1 · #1
    Individual lot title not published
    complete
    Published valueNot published
    The source published no individual title or description for this lot.
    Contract periodNot published
    EligibilityNot published
    Options / renewalNot published
Timeline
  1. Procedure published
    4 Aug 2025, 17:08 BST
  2. Award active
    Not published · Not published
  3. Contract active
    Signed 4 Jun 2025, 00:00 BST · £1,290,722
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards
Singularis Future Serve Pte Ltd
Not published · Not published · active
Contracts
AULA Product Development Resource
£1,290,722 · signed 4 Jun 2025, 00:00 BST · active
Contract period: 5 Jun 2025, 00:00 BST — 5 Jun 2026, 23:59 BST
Bid statisticsNo aggregate bid statistics published
Buyer and organisations in this procedure

Coventry University

Contracting authority GB-PPON-PMMH-2339-NMGH
View buyer profile

  • Coventry University
    buyer

    GB-PPON: PMMH-2339-NMGH
    Priory Street, Coventry, UKG33, CV1 5FB, GB
    Procurement@coventry.ac.uk

  • Singularis Future Serve Pte Ltd
    supplier

    GB-PPON: PNQL-9131-LLRG
    143 CECIL STREET, #25-03, GB BUILDING, SINGAPORE, SG, 069542, SG
    accounts@singularis.ventures
Documents (1)
Official links; attachments are not copied

  • Not published

    tender
    conflictOfInterest
Related procedures (0)
No data
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published
No-engagement rationaleNot published
Procedure rationaleThe justification for direct award is based on the following technical circumstances: Ownership of Proprietary Solution by the Contracting Authority: While the intellectual property rights of the bespoke solution are formally held by Coventry University, the system is wholly designed, configured, and implemented by the supplier. The supplier retains exclusive knowledge of the internal logic, custom-developed components, and maintains the security architecture of the system. Exclusive Technical Know-how and System Familiarity: The supplier's historic involvement in the design and build phases has resulted in a technical environment that cannot be practically or safely supported or modified by any other economic operator. No alternative supplier has access to the internal configuration, source code annotations, or encrypted integration protocols essential for compliant and secure delivery. Risk and Inefficiency of Change in Supplier: Transferring the contract to another provider would result in disproportionate technical risk, including potential service disruption, loss of system integrity, and elevated security exposure. Additionally, engaging a new supplier would entail duplicative discovery costs, lengthy familiarisation, and likely redevelopment, undermining value for money. Due Diligence: An internal technical and commercial appraisal concluded that no alternative supplier could undertake the services without unacceptable risk, cost, and delay.