Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure
£24,999
IT services: consulting
software development
Internet and support
+2 more
UK
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: Ministry of Defence: "£24,999". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
| Contracting Authority | Ministry of Defence | Scope & Categories | Not published | Submission Window | complete No deadline published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submission Gateway | Direct notice route | Legal Basis & Regime | Standard procurement | Estimated Value (exc. VAT) | Not published |
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: Ministry of Defence
Market Analytics
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for Ministry of Defence. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Average Price Reduction
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Competition Density
Not availableNo published reports
Supplier ConcentrationNo estimate
Insufficient attributable awardsNo concentration estimate availablePayment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Coverage: 1 active published awards; 0 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Price reduction compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityMinistry of Defence | Procedure methodNot published | Procurement categoryNot published |
Statuscomplete | Framework / DPSNot published | CompetitionNot published |
Above thresholdNot published | Legal basisNot published | Tender period startsNot published |
Clarification deadlineNot published | Electronic submissionNot published | Submission languagesNot published |
Published16 Feb 2022, 22:45 GMT | Last source update16 Feb 2022, 22:45 GMT | Recurring procurementNot published |
ClassificationIT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support, IT software package, Portable computers | ||
Delivery area UK | ||
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-031818 | ||
What is being bought
£24,999
What changed
From the official release history
- Status changed to complete
16 Feb 2022, 22:45 GMT - Official notice release published
16 Feb 2022, 22:45 GMT - Buyer information updated
16 Feb 2022, 22:45 GMT
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
- Lot 1 · #1Individual lot title not publishedStatus not publishedPublished valueNot publishedSUPPORT CONTRACT FOR THE PROVISION OF HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT FOR PORTABLE PILOT UNITSContract periodNot publishedEligibilityNot publishedOptions / renewalNot published
Timeline
- Procedure published
16 Feb 2022, 22:45 GMT - Award active
Not published · Not published - Contract active
Signed 14 Feb 2022, 00:00 GMT · £24,999
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards IN-SHORE SYSTEMS Not published · Not published · active |
Contracts SUPPORT CONTRACT FOR THE PROVISION OF HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT FOR PORTABLE PILOT UNITS £24,999 · signed 14 Feb 2022, 00:00 GMT · active |
Bid statisticsNo aggregate bid statistics published |
Buyer and organisations in this procedure
Ministry of Defence
Contracting authority GB-FTS-44369Documents (0)
Official links; attachments are not copied
No linked documents are published
Related procedures (0)
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published |
No-engagement rationaleNot published |
Procedure rationalePCR Regulation 32 defines the circumstances for sole source procurement – including the absence of competition for technical reasons, when no reasonable alternative or substitute exists, and the absence of competition is not the result of an artificial narrowing down of the parameters of the procurement.
As such Regulation 32(2)(B), technical justification has been selected. The rationale for applying 32(2)(B) is as follows:
1. Near impossibility for another supplier to achieve the required technical performance or the necessity to use specific know-how, tools or means which only one supplier has at its disposal.
2. Specific interoperability requirements which must be fulfilled in order to ensure the functioning of the supplies, works or services that you are procuring.
Context is included below:
• The PPU system, procured competitively from INSHORE SYSTEMS LTD in 2013, was considered to have a service life of 5 years. It is now recommended that it could remain operational a further 4 years.
• The project team, has completed internal market analysis to investigate if single source procurement is fully justified, including on legal grounds (technical reasons). The findings are that there are specific interoperability requirements to enable the PPU system to function:
(a) The PPU units are only one element of the system. The maintenance requirement also covers the RTK base station, the hardware support for the Toughbook laptops and tablet and the software support for the QASTOR system.
(b) The QASTOR software licences for the tablets and laptops are solely licenced by Inshore Systems. The software licences are the most expensive component of the PPU system, and an additional cost would be incurred to procure new licences with an alternative provider.
(c) Although the initial purchase of the PPU was off the shelf, the PPU system has a number of bespoke and proprietary elements. For example, Inshore Systems have created bespoke vessel outlines (QE Class and T45) for QHM which are essential to the effective operation of the system. Additional costs would be incurred to reproduce this capability if system support was awarded to supplier.
• It is worth note that a replacement PPU is not required, simply maintenance, support and licences for the bespoke system procured in 2013 from INSHORE SYSTEMS LTD.
• The PPU system is bespoke and includes proprietary elements, tailored to QHM requirements with the system configured to meet QHM specific requirements. An alternative service supplier would need to be trained by Inshore Systems to understand the bespoke elements, including system configuration and design.
• This would have associated cost and assumes the co-operation of Inshore Systems. The Requirement Owner believes it would be very challenging for a new supplier to take over support of the system without vital training. |