Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure
Provision Of Replacement Terminal Operating System - Portsmouth International Port
Compliance software package
Database and operating software package
Enterprise resource planning software package
+6 more
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL: "Provision Of Replacement Terminal Operating System - Portsmouth International Port". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
| Contracting Authority | PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL | Scope & Categories | Not published | Submission Window | complete No deadline published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submission Gateway | Direct notice route | Legal Basis & Regime | Standard procurement | Estimated Value (exc. VAT) | Not published |
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL
Market Analytics
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Published-to-award variance
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Competition Density
1.5Bids / Report
Supplier ConcentrationNo estimate
Insufficient attributable awardsNo concentration estimate availablePayment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Coverage: 2 active published awards; 2 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Published-to-award variance compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityPORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL | Procedure methodNot published | Procurement categoryNot published |
Statuscomplete | Framework / DPSNot published | CompetitionNot published |
Above thresholdNot published | Legal basisNot published | Tender period startsNot published |
Clarification deadlineNot published | Electronic submissionNot published | Submission languagesNot published |
Published7 Jun 2021, 22:41 BST | Last source update7 Jun 2021, 22:41 BST | Recurring procurementNot published |
ClassificationCompliance software package, Database and operating software package, Enterprise resource planning software package, Facilities management software package and software package suite, Financial analysis and accounting software package, Industry specific software package, Inventory management software package, Software programming and consultancy services, Statistical software package | ||
Delivery area | ||
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-02b92c | ||
What is being bought
Portsmouth City Council (the 'Council') has awarded a contract to COPAS B.V. (the 'Supplier') to supply and maintain a replacement Terminal Operating System (TOS) for use at Portsmouth International Port.
The new terminal operating system (TOS) is required in order to ensure compliance with UK Government additional Border Control Measures that are required to be in place by 1st July 2021 and also to service a multi-purpose facility including Roll on Roll Off (RoRo) freight haulage serving both the European Union and 'Rest of the World' trade routes, currently the Channel Islands.
The Council awarded the contract on 6th May 2021, with commencement of implementation effective immediately. The contract will run for an initial term of 3 years extendable thereafter on a yearly rolling basis without limits to number of extensions granted and associated contract duration.
Th value of the contract for the 1st year for all acquisition and implementation costs is £268k plus £40k for servicing / maintenance costs making a total 1st year cost of £308k. The ongoing annual servicing / maintenance costs for subsequent years is £40k which equates to a total inclusive 3 year cost of £388k. If further extensions are taken up on a rolling basis this will increase the total cumulative cost of the contract accordingly.
What changed
From the official release history
- Status changed to complete
7 Jun 2021, 22:41 BST - Official notice release published
7 Jun 2021, 22:41 BST - Buyer information updated
7 Jun 2021, 22:41 BST
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
- Lot 1 · #1Individual lot title not publishedcancelledPublished valueNot publishedDuring the course of 2020 the UK Government announced additional Border Control Measures that would be required by UK ports from 2021, referred to as the 'Border Operating Model' (BOM). The BOM, placed requirements on ports and terminals to adapt their operating models, infrastructure and systems so that they can comply with the new requirements that will apply post 2300hrs 31st December 2020, once the BREXIT transition period has concluded. HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) have instructed UK Ports that the new systems and solutions must be fully in place by the 1st July 2021. The new operating system is needed to meet the requirements of the UK Governments new Border Operating Model (BOM), which are to be in place by 1st July 2021. These requirements must include, but are not be limited to: • Electronic interfacing with the Customs Inventory systems (Inventory Linking) to ensure compliance required to obtain a Port Temporary Storage approval from the Customs National Frontiers Unit (NFAU). • Electronic messaging and data transfer for operating the new customs Goods Vehicle Movement Service (GVMS). • Ability to ensure goods that are subject to Customs procedure are not released to the public domain whilst not cleared from a customs process. • Integrations with ferry company manifests and booking systems. The system will be the primary software used for record keeping, planning, control and monitoring for the management of freight units throughout the port estate from the point of arriving at the port either by road or vessel, until the freight unit leaves again either by road or vessel. To comply with the BOM requirements, the Port is establishing a Border Control Post (BCP). The BCP will be operated on behalf of the Port by a separate provider Portico (BCP Service Provider) under contract. Portico operate a deep water cargo terminal which neighbours the Port and are uniquely placed to offer the required services on an operationally effective and economical basis. The solution will must integrate seamlessly to the BCP service provider's software system which can only really be achieved effectively via both parties using the same system especially within the timeframe for system implementation and launch which has been placed upon the Port by UK Government. The BCP service provider currently uses the COPAS system provided by the Supplier and has no intention of reviewing these arrangements at present, hence the Port's decision to enter into contract via direct award to the Supplier to ensure system compatibility. It should also be noted that even if Portico were not the appointed BCP service provider the Port would still need to ensure system compatibility with Portico which can only be effectively achieved via purchase of the COPAS system due to: • As mandated by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the Animal & Plant Health Agency (APHA) any unit being requested to transfer from the Port to the BCP for an inspection must have a full audit trail of the journey from leaving the Port to arriving and then leaving the BCP Facility. This is to ensure that any contaminated consignment does not make its way into the normal food chain. All units whether accompanied or unaccompanied will have to travel across the Portico site to attend the BCP facility and therefore will have to be shown within Portico's own system which is the COPAS system, otherwise a gap in the audit trail will occur and effective tracking of the unit is significantly compromised. • Units will also need to be logged onto the Portico system for security purposes as Portico's site is covered by ISPS (International Ship and Port Facility Security Code). As well as for health and safety reasons. • Portico hold a 30 year lease of the land in question and the Port and wider Council has no ability to force Portico to change their current operating systems, therefore any system the Port uses must seamlessly integrate with Portico's systems. • To retain the Port's current trade levels, the Port requires 'Temporary Storage Approval' to allow existing channel island traffic to continue. To gain Temporary Storage Approval the Port requires Inventory Linking. To allow unaccompanied units arriving from the EU to pass through a Temporary Storage area inventory linking is also required. To be inventory linked our systems need to integrate with a community service provider (CSP). • The current CSP used by Condor (a key Port customer) and Portico is CNS. Therefore the Port's systems need to link to CNS. The COPAS system already includes for integration to CNS. Changing to a different CSP would cause cost and inconvenience to Portcio and Condor who would be under no legally binding obligation to facilitate the required integration. The introduction of the COPAS system will help to safeguard the Port's existing and future freight income streams, which currently amount to approximately £3.9 million per annum. Without this passenger and tonnage income may also be put at risk. If freight were not carried some routes may become uneconomic for operators and therefore cease.Contract periodNot publishedEligibilityNot publishedOptions / renewalNot published
Timeline
- Procedure published
7 Jun 2021, 22:41 BST - Award active
Not published · Not published - Contract active
Signed 6 May 2021, 00:00 BST · £388,000
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards COPAS BV Not published · Not published · active |
Contracts Contract £388,000 · signed 6 May 2021, 00:00 BST · active |
Bid statistics bids: 1 (lot 1) electronicBids: 0 (lot 1) smeBids: 0 (lot 1) |
Buyer and organisations in this procedure
PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL
Contracting authority GB-FTS-4436Documents (0)
Official links; attachments are not copied
No linked documents are published
Related procedures (0)
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published |
No-engagement rationaleNot published |
Procedure rationaleDuring the course of 2020 the UK Government announced additional Border Control Measures that would be required by UK ports from 2021, referred to as the 'Border Operating Model' (BOM).
The BOM, placed requirements on ports and terminals to adapt their operating models, infrastructure and systems so that they can comply with the new requirements that will apply post 2300hrs 31st December 2020, once the BREXIT transition period has concluded.
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) have instructed UK Ports that the new systems and solutions must be fully in place by the 1st July 2021.
The new operating system provided by the Supplier is needed to meet the requirements of the UK Governments new Border Operating Model (BOM), which are to be in place by 1st July 2021.
To comply with the BOM requirements, the Port is establishing a Border Control Post (BCP). The BCP will be operated on behalf of the Port by a separate provider Portico (BCP Service Provider) under contract.
The solution will must integrate seamlessly to the BCP service provider's software system which can only really be achieved effectively via both parties using the same system especially within the timeframe for system implementation and launch which has been placed upon the Port by UK Government.
The BCP service provider currently uses the COPAS system provided by the Supplier and has no intention of reviewing these arrangements at present, hence the Port's decision to enter into contract via direct award to the Supplier to ensure system compatibility.
It should also be noted that even if Portico were not the appointed BCP service provider the Port would still need to ensure system compatibility with Portico which can only be effectively achieved via purchase of the COPAS system due to:
• As mandated by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the Animal & Plant Health Agency (APHA) any unit being requested to transfer from the Port to the BCP for an inspection must have a full audit trail of the journey from leaving the Port to arriving and then leaving the BCP Facility. This is to ensure that any contaminated consignment does not make its way into the normal food chain. All units whether accompanied or unaccompanied will have to travel across the Portico site to attend the BCP facility and therefore will have to be shown within Portico's own system which is the COPAS system, otherwise a gap in the audit trail will occur and effective tracking of the unit is significantly compromised.
• Units will also need to be logged onto the Portico system for security purposes as Portico's site is covered by ISPS (International Ship and Port Facility Security Code). As well as for health and safety reasons.
• Portico hold a 30 year lease of the land in question and the Port and wider Council has no ability to force Portico to change their current operating systems, therefore any system the Port uses must seamlessly integrate with Portico's systems.
• To retain the Port's current trade levels, the Port requires 'Temporary Storage Approval' to allow existing channel island traffic to continue. To gain Temporary Storage Approval the Port requires Inventory Linking. To allow unaccompanied units arriving from the EU to pass through a Temporary Storage area inventory linking is also required. To be inventory linked our systems need to integrate with a community service provider (CSP).
• The current CSP used by Condor (a key Port customer) and Portico is CNS. Therefore the Port's systems need to link to CNS. The COPAS system already includes for integration to CNS. Changing to a different CSP would cause cost and inconvenience to Portcio and Condor who would be under no legally binding obligation to facilitate the required integration. |