Official UK procurement notice
Provision of BACs Processing System
Authority: Caerphilly County Borough Council (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe Council is exploring the market for BACS‑approved, cloud‑based solutions and is seeking feedback on how suppliers can support
The Council is seeking a BACS‑approved, cloud‑based (SaaS) BACS payment and Direct Debit processing solution to support its high‑volume, mission‑critical payment operations. The solution must enable secure access to BACS for both inbound and outbound transactions, including the receipt of payments via BACS Direct Credits, payroll processing, outbound supplier and beneficiary payments, and Direct Debit collections.
The BACS system must be implemented and operational by 17 July 2027.
The following describes the Council’s current assumptions and initial view of its needs. Suppliers are encouraged to challenge these assumptions and propose alternative approaches where appropriate.
We are interested in understanding how supplier solutions support:
The solution should support:
Core Capabilities
All standard BACs payment types, including payroll, payments (Direct Credits), and Direct Debits
Submission of AUDDIS files
Sterling payments to and from UK bank accounts
24/7 browser-based access, allowing multiple authorised users to operate concurrently
Reporting and audit access, including historical transaction and user activity data
Processing of Payments for 10 independent business areas/External Systems
Scalability and configurable
Security and Risk Management
Key security and control features to include:
Multi-factor authentication, including options for smartcard-based (allowing digital signing of payment files), and/or smartcard‑free access
Granular user permissions and authorisation levels, supporting segregation of duties
Confirmation of Payee and payer name verification, to reduce misdirected payments and fraud risk
Validation of bank account numbers, sort codes and payment dates, including bank holiday awareness
These controls must be designed to support compliance, reduce failed payments and minimise operational risk.
Operational Flexibility and Automation
As part of an ongoing review of how we work, we would like the potential to:
Automate Direct Debit processing
Manage Direct Debit mandates, schedules, and transaction types electronically
Configure payment approval workflows aligned with organisational governance requirements
This flexibility would support the continued use of manual processing where required, while providing the option to progress towards increased automation over time, informed by the outcomes of the review.
Architecture and Deployment
Delivered as a Software as a Service (SaaS) solution
Accessible from standard web browsers, preferably Microsoft Edge
Support multi‑bank operation, enabling bank‑agnostic payment processing and future flexibility
Availability and Reliability
High system availability to ensure consistent access for users
Reliable end‑to‑end performance across submission, validation, and payment management
Support and Implementation
Configuration and implementation support
User training (on‑site or remote)
Documentation, user guides and helpdesk support
The high-level requirements set out above are not exhaustive. Please include any additional information you consider relevant or beneficial.
CPV: Banking services · Financial analysis and accounting software package · Financial consultancy, financial transaction processing and clearing-house services · Processing and clearing services · Software implementation services · Software supply services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1PlannedRenewal
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Caerphilly County Borough Council buys Software-related services (CPV 7226), and who usually turns up
Caerphilly County Borough Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Software-related services (CPV 7226) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
No small-firm winners recorded among this authority’s published awards in this sample.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Wales (Cymru).
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 89 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid15% / 0%
2–336% / 20%
4–618% / 40%
7+30% / 40%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate44% / 58%
Within ±2%38% / 24%
Above estimate19% / 18%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 6613Published estimate£250k
This lot is listed as CPV 6613. The table above uses the notice category.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 28 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid7%
2–361%
4–618%
7+14%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gladstone MRM LimitedEarlier contract | The Provision of a Leisure Management Systemstarted Aug 2027 | — | £1.5m | Matched as the earlier contract |
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 25 Jun 2026, 13:30 BST
- Last source update
- 25 Jun 2026, 13:30 BST
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-059854- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06bd1aFind a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
25 Jun 2026 → 16 Jul 2027 · 4 dates- Planning notice published122 days ago25 Jun 2026, 13:30 BST
- Market engagement104 days ago13 Jul 2026, 23:59 BST
With the above requirements in mind, we invite you to respond to the questions below.
- Experience & Capability
Briefly describe your organisation’s experience in delivering BACS payment solutions, particularly for public sector or complex multi‑service environments.
- Solution Overview
Please provide a high-level overview of your solution, including:
Key BACS functionality supported
How payments and Direct Debits are managed
- Security & Controls How does your solution ensure secure and compliant operations, including:
User controls and audit
Fraud prevention / validation
Relevant certifications
- Integration & Operating Model How does your solution:
Integrate with other systems
Support multiple business areas and banking relationships
- Commercial & Market Insight
Please provide:
Typical pricing approach and cost drivers
Any key risks or challenges
Any alternative approaches the Council should consider
Whether you would be interested in bidding
Please can the above information be sent to [email protected] by COP on Monday 13 July 2026.
- Tender notice expected86 days ago31 Jul 2026, 23:59 BST
- Today25 Oct 2026
- Contract startsin 263 days16 Jul 2027, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published25 Jun 2026, 13:30 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender