TenderlineUK
Procurement Intelligence
Official OCDS
Find a Tender
complete
#h6vhtk-067055
Published 20 Mar 2026, 13:02 GMT
Official UK Procurement Procedure

SWBH - 2023/2024 Community Breastfeeding Peer Support Service

Published value
Not published
Contract value exc. VAT
Submission deadline
Open opportunity
complete
Lots published
1
Lots published in procedure
Contract duration
Standard
Published delivery schedule
Electronic Sourcing Gateway:
Published portal

What is being bought & procurement scope

Procurement Scope & Specification
Tenderline summary generated from the published notice
Executive Summary: Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust: "SWBH - 2023/2024 Community Breastfeeding Peer Support Service". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
Official Requirement Description:
SWBH - Community Breastfeeding Peer Support Service for new mothers across Sandwell towns. Internal Department Contact: Jade Osbourne / Helen Hurst

Lots and requirements (1)

Procurement Structure
Published by the contracting authority
  • Lot 1 · #1
    Individual lot title not published
    complete
    Published valueNot published
    The source published no individual title or description for this lot.
    Contract period:
    Not published
    Eligibility:
    Not published

Qualification snapshot & criteria

Go / No-Go Decision Box
Criteria & entry requirements
Evaluation weighting
Award criteria weighting not published in structured data — consult the tender pack documents.
Incumbent & Market Position
Open Competition LandscapeNo single vendor holds a majority of retained authority awards.
Entry requirements & qualification
  • Turnover Benchmark
    Guideline requirement: ~2× annual contract value annual turnover.Per Cabinet Office EFS 2026 & Sourcing Playbook: general proportionality cap (~2× run-rate), not an automatic disqualifier.
  • Insurance Commitments (No Upfront Purchase Needed)
    Standard public thresholds: Employer Liability (£5m), Public Liability (£5m-£10m), Professional Indemnity (£1m-£5m).✓ Commitment required upon award only — no upfront policy purchase needed to bid
  • Accreditations & Security Vetting
    Check tender pack for Cyber Essentials Plus (PPN 014 risk-proportional), ISO 27001/9001, and BPSS / SC security clearance requirements for named delivery personnel.
  • Source: Cabinet Office Sourcing Playbook & EFS Guidance.

    Sector Market Benchmark & Opportunity Radar

    CPV 85 · UK Sector Analysis
    Observed CPV-sector evidence
    Prepared 7 Sept 2026, 14:38 BST
    Observed CPV-sector evidence where it exists, with clearly labelled UK all-sector context for sparse fields; this is market context, not a bid forecast.
    Median Winning Discount
    Not recorded
    No comparable price observations published
    Typical Bids Received
    Not recorded
    No published bid reports in this sector
    Decision Velocity
    Not recorded
    No published deadline-to-award observations
    Notice Stability
    1 updates
    Published terms remained unchanged
    Top Contenders in this Sector (CPV 85)
    Active commercial suppliers winning public contracts in this field
    Supplier
    Awards won
    Total awarded value
    Avg. winning discount
    445 contracts£589,385At ceiling / not disclosed
    404 contracts£1,860,313,031At ceiling / not disclosed
    300 contracts£232,055At ceiling / not disclosed
    251 contracts£779,257At ceiling / not disclosed
    243 contracts£257,522At ceiling / not disclosed
    228 contracts£251,448At ceiling / not disclosed
    225 contracts£169,325At ceiling / not disclosed
    219 contracts£251,097At ceiling / not disclosed
    202 contracts£597,982At ceiling / not disclosed
    180 contracts£212,030At ceiling / not disclosed
    Comparable Published Opportunities & Re-tender Precedents
    Historic records ranked from matching published evidence. They serve as research precedents for contract scoping, specifications, and previous awardees.
    No sufficiently evidenced comparable record has been calculated yet.
    Method: tender-intelligence-v1. Empirical OCDS facts and cross-sector percentiles; missing fields remain unrecorded.

    Procedure terms & legal framework

    Procedure methodStandard public procedureLegal basisStandard UK Procurement RulesProcurement categoryServices
    Notice statuscompleteProcurement thresholdSub-thresholdRegulatory regimeStandard commercial regime
    Commercial structureStand-alone contract (No framework)Competition typeCompetitive procedureGPA WTO coveredUnspecified in notice
    Recurring procurementNo (One-off requirement)First published20 Mar 2026, 13:02 GMTLast source update20 Mar 2026, 13:02 GMT
    Classification (CPV)Unspecified in notice
    Delivery areaLocation not published
    Official Registry OCIDocds-h6vhtk-067055
    Timeline
    1. Procedure published
      20 Mar 2026, 13:02 GMT
    2. Award pending
      Not published · £149,000

    Commercial outcome and contract awards

    Awards (1)
    THE BREASTFEEDING NETWORK
    £149,000 · Not published · pending
    Contracts (0)No contract published
    Bid statisticsNo aggregate bid statistics published
    Notice history
    From official release and amendment events
    1. Status changed to complete
      20 Mar 2026, 13:02 GMT
    2. Official notice release published
      20 Mar 2026, 13:02 GMT
    3. Buyer information updated
      20 Mar 2026, 13:02 GMT

    Buyer and organisations in this procedure

    Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

    Contracting authority
    NHS & Healthcare
    GB-PPON-PYHH-6963-BGQM
    View buyer profile →
    Award and contract changes

    Official Documents & Specifications (1)

    Official links; attachments are not copied
    • Conflict of interest declaration

      tender
      Conflict of interest declaration
      Notice declares: Not published
    Procedure justification & pre-market engagement
    Official Statement
    Procedure rationale (direct award / limited competition)The existing provider is satisfying the original contract requirements, and changing provider would not be in the best interests of patients, service users, or the contracting authority.