Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 24 Aug 2026, 10:33 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Tove Learning Trust Financial Software

Authority: TOVE LEARNING TRUST (Public body)

GoodsAbove thresholdSME suitableVCSE suitable
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 yrsends 31 Aug 2030 · up to 31 Aug 2032 with extensions · starts 1 Sept 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Preliminary Market Engagement:

Financial Management System

Issued by: Tove Learning Trust (TLT)

Target Audience: Financial Software Providers and ERP Vendors

  1. Overview and Purpose

Tove Learning Trust is looking to upgrade its core finance software across our central team and our growing community of academies. We are running this pre-market engagement exercise to let prospective suppliers know what we need from a system and to see what solutions are currently available in the market.

We need a modern, resilient, cloud-hosted platform that can handle multiple school entities seamlessly. The system must make life easier for our staff by cutting down on repetitive administrative tasks, while providing clear, straightforward financial tools for both our core finance teams and non-specialist staff like Headteachers and budget holders.

This Preliminary Market Engagement exercise is issued for information gathering purposes only. It does not constitute a call for competition, invitation to tender, or any commitment by Tove Learning Trust to commence a procurement process. Participation in this exercise will not confer any advantage or disadvantage in any future procurement.

Contract Dates (estimated)

01/04/2027 to 31/03/2030 OR 01/09/2027 to 31/08/2030

Main procurement category

Goods/Services

Engagement Deadline

15/09/2026

Engagement Process Description

Interested suppliers are invited to submit an expression of interest via email to [email protected] no later than 15th September 2026. Please outline within your expression of interest how you believe your product can deliver on the requirements detailed below.

We intend to open a booking calendar for suppliers to hold online or in person demonstrations to key stakeholders during September/October 2026 (dates to be confirmed). These slots will be limited and we will select suppliers for demonstration based on how well their expression of interest matches our key requirements.

  1. Core System Requirements

Following an internal review across 15 of our schools, our finance staff, School Business Managers, and leaders highlighted several essential operational priorities. Any prospective solution must comfortably meet these standards:

2a System Stability and Performance

Reliability: System downtime disrupts day-to-day operations meaning we require an exceptionally stable platform with minimal downtime.

Fast Loading Times: The software needs to be highly responsive. Slow page loading and lagging click transitions create frustration and impact on productivity.

Accessibility: The platform must be fully cloud-based. As well as desktop use, it would be beneficial if it was also compatible with mobile devices so users can easily manage tasks and complete approvals remotely.

2b Data Visibility and Navigation

Easy Transaction Drill-Down: Finance staff should be able to click through transactions naturally-moving from a supplier record straight to relevant invoices, purchase orders, and audit histories without navigating away.

In-System Analysis: Staff need to view and drill down into detailed transactional data directly within the system interface, rather than having to export data to external spreadsheets just to read it.

2c Purchasing, Automation, and Approvals

Integrated Purchasing Portal: We require a user-friendly, school-level portal that handles the entire procurement cycle: requisitioning, multi-level approval workflows, purchase ordering, goods receiving, and budget checks.

Paperless Approvals: The system should automatically email approvers with direct links for simple approvals.A configurable tiered approval process should be built into the software as standard.

Automated Document Dispatch: The software must automatically email purchase orders, invoices, and payment remittances directly to suppliers and internal stakeholders.

Invoice Scanning (OCR): To save time and reduce manual entry errors, the system should scan uploaded PDF invoices and automatically populate the transaction details.

Preferred Supplier Indicators: A simple visual indicator is needed to show school-based users which suppliers have already been vetted and approved by the central Trust procurement team.

Other Document Scanning and Parsing: contract reading capabilities with AI identification of contract terms including renewals, terminations and indexation.

  1. Core Accounting and Reporting Modules

The chosen software must include robust, established modules for standard school accounting operations. These must be thoroughly developed and uniformly capable across the board:

Cost Centre and Budget Holder Reporting

Trial Balance and Ledger Code Reporting

Aged Debtor and Aged Creditor Reports

Bank Reconciliation (ideally with direct bank feeds or straightforward file imports)

Budgeting, Cashflow, and Forecasting Management Tools

Supplier and Customer Master Files with secure bank detail audit logs

Full Management Accounts direct from the system

  1. Specific Operational Feedback and Integration Needs

Based on hands-on experience, our finance teams have highlighted a few critical operational expectations:

4a Parity Between Purchase and Sales Ledgers

Many school finance systems focus heavily on the Purchase Ledger while providing a basic, limited Sales Ledger. Consistent capability and reporting depth on both sides would be highly beneficial.

4b IMP Software Integration

The Trust uses IMP for budget planning and forecasting and integrated curriculum financial planning. We are particularly interested in hearing from suppliers whose financial systems can either

integrate dynamically and effectively with our existing IMP environment to keep our data consistent and prevent double-entry

OR

demonstrate an embedded or directly linked Integrated Curriculum Financial Planning (ICFP) module built into the platform that can pull real-time finance and staffing data to run multi-year strategic scenarios natively.

4c Security Roles

To match our internal organisational structure, the system must allow us to set up specific user roles and permissions.

4d Direct Support

When technical issues arise, school-based users need to be able to raise their own tickets directly with the software provider's help desk without having to route these through the central Trust finance team.

The Central Team should have access or reporting capabilities related to these tickets in order to oversee the KPIs of the contract.

  1. Next Steps for Interested Suppliers

Interested suppliers are invited to submit an expression of interest via email to [email protected] no later than 15th September 2026. Please outline within your expression of interest how you believe your product can deliver on the requirements detailed

CPV: Financial analysis and accounting software package

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 3 yrsSMEVCSE
Contract period: 1 Sept 2027 – 31 Aug 2030 (3 yrs) · up to 31 Aug 2032 with extensions
Extensions: Extension options published

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

Competition for Financial analysis and accounting software package (CPV 4844), and who usually turns up

TOVE LEARNING TRUST has too little published record in this market to describe on its own. Published market evidence for the same work stands beside whatever it has. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Financial analysis and accounting software package (CPV 4844) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bidWhat to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Market: CPV 4844 · UK-wide, n=67
30%

Across this market, small firms won 30% of awards with a known supplier size.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means the winner is registered in the region where that contract was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Market: CPV 4844 · UK-wide, n=71
17%

Across this market, 17% of winners were registered in the delivery region.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Market: CPV 4844 · UK-wide, n=17
52 days

Half of these awards were announced within 52 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Market: CPV 4844 · East Midlands, n=6
67%

Across this market, 67% of awarded procurements had no recorded rival.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

The market32 lots with bid counts · CPV 4844 · UK-wide
13% had one bid
Market · select a colour for counts
1 bid13%
Market: 4 of 32 lots with published bid counts.
2–316%
Market: 5 of 32 lots with published bid counts.
4–641%
Market: 13 of 32 lots with published bid counts.
7+31%
Market: 10 of 32 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

The market16 lots with estimate and award · CPV 4844 · UK-wide
56% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate56%
Market: 9 of 16 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%31%
Market: 5 of 16 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate13%
Market: 2 of 16 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 484436 monthsSME suitableEstimate not published
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 33 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet6% single-bid risk
Past bids on 33 similar lots
1 bid6%
2 of 33 similar past lots received 1 bid (6%).
2–355%
18 of 33 similar past lots received 2–3 (55%).
4–627%
9 of 33 similar past lots received 4–6 (27%).
7+12%
4 of 33 similar past lots received 7+ (12%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
24 Aug 2026, 10:33 BST
Last source update
24 Aug 2026, 10:33 BST
Authority reference
TLT003
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-080202
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Financial analysis and accounting software package
Delivery area
North East (UKC)North West (UKD)Yorkshire & Humber (UKE)East Midlands (UKF)West Midlands (UKG)East of England (UKH)London (UKI)South East (UKJ)
+1 moreSouth West (UKK)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06ea37 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

24 Aug 2026 → 1 Sept 2027 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published58 days ago
    24 Aug 2026, 10:33 BST
  2. Market engagement36 days ago
    15 Sept 2026, 23:59 BST

    Preliminary Market Engagement:

    Financial Management System

    Issued by: Tove Learning Trust (TLT)

    Target Audience: Financial Software Providers and ERP Vendors

    1. Overview and Purpose

    Tove Learning Trust is looking to upgrade its core finance software across our central team and our growing community of academies. We are running this pre-market engagement exercise to let prospective suppliers know what we need from a system and to see what solutions are currently available in the market.

    We need a modern, resilient, cloud-hosted platform that can handle multiple school entities seamlessly. The system must make life easier for our staff by cutting down on repetitive administrative tasks, while providing clear, straightforward financial tools for both our core finance teams and non-specialist staff like Headteachers and budget holders.

    This Preliminary Market Engagement exercise is issued for information gathering purposes only. It does not constitute a call for competition, invitation to tender, or any commitment by Tove Learning Trust to commence a procurement process. Participation in this exercise will not confer any advantage or disadvantage in any future procurement.

    Contract Dates (estimated)

    01/04/2027 to 31/03/2030 OR 01/09/2027 to 31/08/2030

    Main procurement category

    Goods/Services

    Engagement Deadline

    15/09/2026

    Engagement Process Description

    Interested suppliers are invited to submit an expression of interest via email to [email protected] no later than 15th September 2026. Please outline within your expression of interest how you believe your product can deliver on the requirements detailed below.

    We intend to open a booking calendar for suppliers to hold online or in person demonstrations to key stakeholders during September/October 2026 (dates to be confirmed). These slots will be limited and we will select suppliers for demonstration based on how well their expression of interest matches our key requirements.

    1. Core System Requirements

    Following an internal review across 15 of our schools, our finance staff, School Business Managers, and leaders highlighted several essential operational priorities. Any prospective solution must comfortably meet these standards:

    2a System Stability and Performance

    Reliability: System downtime disrupts day-to-day operations meaning we require an exceptionally stable platform with minimal downtime.

    Fast Loading Times: The software needs to be highly responsive. Slow page loading and lagging click transitions create frustration and impact on productivity.

    Accessibility: The platform must be fully cloud-based. As well as desktop use, it would be beneficial if it was also compatible with mobile devices so users can easily manage tasks and complete approvals remotely.

    2b Data Visibility and Navigation

    Easy Transaction Drill-Down: Finance staff should be able to click through transactions naturally-moving from a supplier record straight to relevant invoices, purchase orders, and audit histories without navigating away.

    In-System Analysis: Staff need to view and drill down into detailed transactional data directly within the system interface, rather than having to export data to external spreadsheets just to read it.

    2c Purchasing, Automation, and Approvals

    Integrated Purchasing Portal: We require a user-friendly, school-level portal that handles the entire procurement cycle: requisitioning, multi-level approval workflows, purchase ordering, goods receiving, and budget checks.

    Paperless Approvals: The system should automatically email approvers with direct links for simple approvals.A configurable tiered approval process should be built into the software as standard.

    Automated Document Dispatch: The software must automatically email purchase orders, invoices, and payment remittances directly to suppliers and internal stakeholders.

    Invoice Scanning (OCR): To save time and reduce manual entry errors, the system should scan uploaded PDF invoices and automatically populate the transaction details.

    Preferred Supplier Indicators: A simple visual indicator is needed to show school-based users which suppliers have already been vetted and approved by the central Trust procurement team.

    Other Document Scanning and Parsing: contract reading capabilities with AI identification of contract terms including renewals, terminations and indexation.

    1. Core Accounting and Reporting Modules

    The chosen software must include robust, established modules for standard school accounting operations. These must be thoroughly developed and uniformly capable across the board:

    Cost Centre and Budget Holder Reporting

    Trial Balance and Ledger Code Reporting

    Aged Debtor and Aged Creditor Reports

    Bank Reconciliation (ideally with direct bank feeds or straightforward file imports)

    Budgeting, Cashflow, and Forecasting Management Tools

    Supplier and Customer Master Files with secure bank detail audit logs

    Full Management Accounts direct from the system

    1. Specific Operational Feedback and Integration Needs

    Based on hands-on experience, our finance teams have highlighted a few critical operational expectations:

    4a Parity Between Purchase and Sales Ledgers

    Many school finance systems focus heavily on the Purchase Ledger while providing a basic, limited Sales Ledger. Consistent capability and reporting depth on both sides would be highly beneficial.

    4b IMP Software Integration

    The Trust uses IMP for budget planning and forecasting and integrated curriculum financial planning. We are particularly interested in hearing from suppliers whose financial systems can either

    integrate dynamically and effectively with our existing IMP environment to keep our data consistent and prevent double-entry

    OR

    demonstrate an embedded or directly linked Integrated Curriculum Financial Planning (ICFP) module built into the platform that can pull real-time finance and staffing data to run multi-year strategic scenarios natively.

    4c Security Roles

    To match our internal organisational structure, the system must allow us to set up specific user roles and permissions.

    4d Direct Support

    When technical issues arise, school-based users need to be able to raise their own tickets directly with the software provider's help desk without having to route these through the central Trust finance team.

    The Central Team should have access or reporting capabilities related to these tickets in order to oversee the KPIs of the contract.

    1. Next Steps for Interested Suppliers

    Interested suppliers are invited to submit an expression of interest via email to [email protected] no later than 15th September 2026. Please outline within your expression of interest how you believe your product can deliver on the requirements detailed

  3. Today
    21 Oct 2026
  4. Contract startsin 314 days
    1 Sept 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    24 Aug 2026, 10:33 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

TOVE LEARNING TRUST

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-COH: 07525820 · GB-PPON: PJXP-3935-HXGY c/o Elizabeth Woodville School, Stratford Road, Roade, East Midlands, NN7 2LPContact name, email, phone

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure