Official UK procurement notice
Tove Learning Trust Financial Software
Authority: TOVE LEARNING TRUST (Public body)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionPreliminary Market Engagement:
Financial Management System
Issued by: Tove Learning Trust (TLT)
Target Audience: Financial Software Providers and ERP Vendors
- Overview and Purpose
Tove Learning Trust is looking to upgrade its core finance software across our central team and our growing community of academies. We are running this pre-market engagement exercise to let prospective suppliers know what we need from a system and to see what solutions are currently available in the market.
We need a modern, resilient, cloud-hosted platform that can handle multiple school entities seamlessly. The system must make life easier for our staff by cutting down on repetitive administrative tasks, while providing clear, straightforward financial tools for both our core finance teams and non-specialist staff like Headteachers and budget holders.
This Preliminary Market Engagement exercise is issued for information gathering purposes only. It does not constitute a call for competition, invitation to tender, or any commitment by Tove Learning Trust to commence a procurement process. Participation in this exercise will not confer any advantage or disadvantage in any future procurement.
Contract Dates (estimated)
01/04/2027 to 31/03/2030 OR 01/09/2027 to 31/08/2030
Main procurement category
Goods/Services
Engagement Deadline
15/09/2026
Engagement Process Description
Interested suppliers are invited to submit an expression of interest via email to [email protected] no later than 15th September 2026. Please outline within your expression of interest how you believe your product can deliver on the requirements detailed below.
We intend to open a booking calendar for suppliers to hold online or in person demonstrations to key stakeholders during September/October 2026 (dates to be confirmed). These slots will be limited and we will select suppliers for demonstration based on how well their expression of interest matches our key requirements.
- Core System Requirements
Following an internal review across 15 of our schools, our finance staff, School Business Managers, and leaders highlighted several essential operational priorities. Any prospective solution must comfortably meet these standards:
2a System Stability and Performance
Reliability: System downtime disrupts day-to-day operations meaning we require an exceptionally stable platform with minimal downtime.
Fast Loading Times: The software needs to be highly responsive. Slow page loading and lagging click transitions create frustration and impact on productivity.
Accessibility: The platform must be fully cloud-based. As well as desktop use, it would be beneficial if it was also compatible with mobile devices so users can easily manage tasks and complete approvals remotely.
2b Data Visibility and Navigation
Easy Transaction Drill-Down: Finance staff should be able to click through transactions naturally-moving from a supplier record straight to relevant invoices, purchase orders, and audit histories without navigating away.
In-System Analysis: Staff need to view and drill down into detailed transactional data directly within the system interface, rather than having to export data to external spreadsheets just to read it.
2c Purchasing, Automation, and Approvals
Integrated Purchasing Portal: We require a user-friendly, school-level portal that handles the entire procurement cycle: requisitioning, multi-level approval workflows, purchase ordering, goods receiving, and budget checks.
Paperless Approvals: The system should automatically email approvers with direct links for simple approvals.A configurable tiered approval process should be built into the software as standard.
Automated Document Dispatch: The software must automatically email purchase orders, invoices, and payment remittances directly to suppliers and internal stakeholders.
Invoice Scanning (OCR): To save time and reduce manual entry errors, the system should scan uploaded PDF invoices and automatically populate the transaction details.
Preferred Supplier Indicators: A simple visual indicator is needed to show school-based users which suppliers have already been vetted and approved by the central Trust procurement team.
Other Document Scanning and Parsing: contract reading capabilities with AI identification of contract terms including renewals, terminations and indexation.
- Core Accounting and Reporting Modules
The chosen software must include robust, established modules for standard school accounting operations. These must be thoroughly developed and uniformly capable across the board:
Cost Centre and Budget Holder Reporting
Trial Balance and Ledger Code Reporting
Aged Debtor and Aged Creditor Reports
Bank Reconciliation (ideally with direct bank feeds or straightforward file imports)
Budgeting, Cashflow, and Forecasting Management Tools
Supplier and Customer Master Files with secure bank detail audit logs
Full Management Accounts direct from the system
- Specific Operational Feedback and Integration Needs
Based on hands-on experience, our finance teams have highlighted a few critical operational expectations:
4a Parity Between Purchase and Sales Ledgers
Many school finance systems focus heavily on the Purchase Ledger while providing a basic, limited Sales Ledger. Consistent capability and reporting depth on both sides would be highly beneficial.
4b IMP Software Integration
The Trust uses IMP for budget planning and forecasting and integrated curriculum financial planning. We are particularly interested in hearing from suppliers whose financial systems can either
integrate dynamically and effectively with our existing IMP environment to keep our data consistent and prevent double-entry
OR
demonstrate an embedded or directly linked Integrated Curriculum Financial Planning (ICFP) module built into the platform that can pull real-time finance and staffing data to run multi-year strategic scenarios natively.
4c Security Roles
To match our internal organisational structure, the system must allow us to set up specific user roles and permissions.
4d Direct Support
When technical issues arise, school-based users need to be able to raise their own tickets directly with the software provider's help desk without having to route these through the central Trust finance team.
The Central Team should have access or reporting capabilities related to these tickets in order to oversee the KPIs of the contract.
- Next Steps for Interested Suppliers
Interested suppliers are invited to submit an expression of interest via email to [email protected] no later than 15th September 2026. Please outline within your expression of interest how you believe your product can deliver on the requirements detailed
CPV: Financial analysis and accounting software package
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
Competition for Financial analysis and accounting software package (CPV 4844), and who usually turns up
TOVE LEARNING TRUST has too little published record in this market to describe on its own. Published market evidence for the same work stands beside whatever it has. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Financial analysis and accounting software package (CPV 4844) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Across this market, small firms won 30% of awards with a known supplier size.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means the winner is registered in the region where that contract was delivered.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Across this market, 17% of winners were registered in the delivery region.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 52 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Across this market, 67% of awarded procurements had no recorded rival.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid13%
2–316%
4–641%
7+31%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate56%
Within ±2%31%
Above estimate13%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 4844Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 33 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid6%
2–355%
4–627%
7+12%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 24 Aug 2026, 10:33 BST
- Last source update
- 24 Aug 2026, 10:33 BST
- Authority reference
TLT003- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-080202- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06ea37Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
24 Aug 2026 → 1 Sept 2027 · 3 dates- Planning notice published58 days ago24 Aug 2026, 10:33 BST
- Market engagement36 days ago15 Sept 2026, 23:59 BST
Preliminary Market Engagement:
Financial Management System
Issued by: Tove Learning Trust (TLT)
Target Audience: Financial Software Providers and ERP Vendors
- Overview and Purpose
Tove Learning Trust is looking to upgrade its core finance software across our central team and our growing community of academies. We are running this pre-market engagement exercise to let prospective suppliers know what we need from a system and to see what solutions are currently available in the market.
We need a modern, resilient, cloud-hosted platform that can handle multiple school entities seamlessly. The system must make life easier for our staff by cutting down on repetitive administrative tasks, while providing clear, straightforward financial tools for both our core finance teams and non-specialist staff like Headteachers and budget holders.
This Preliminary Market Engagement exercise is issued for information gathering purposes only. It does not constitute a call for competition, invitation to tender, or any commitment by Tove Learning Trust to commence a procurement process. Participation in this exercise will not confer any advantage or disadvantage in any future procurement.
Contract Dates (estimated)
01/04/2027 to 31/03/2030 OR 01/09/2027 to 31/08/2030
Main procurement category
Goods/Services
Engagement Deadline
15/09/2026
Engagement Process Description
Interested suppliers are invited to submit an expression of interest via email to [email protected] no later than 15th September 2026. Please outline within your expression of interest how you believe your product can deliver on the requirements detailed below.
We intend to open a booking calendar for suppliers to hold online or in person demonstrations to key stakeholders during September/October 2026 (dates to be confirmed). These slots will be limited and we will select suppliers for demonstration based on how well their expression of interest matches our key requirements.
- Core System Requirements
Following an internal review across 15 of our schools, our finance staff, School Business Managers, and leaders highlighted several essential operational priorities. Any prospective solution must comfortably meet these standards:
2a System Stability and Performance
Reliability: System downtime disrupts day-to-day operations meaning we require an exceptionally stable platform with minimal downtime.
Fast Loading Times: The software needs to be highly responsive. Slow page loading and lagging click transitions create frustration and impact on productivity.
Accessibility: The platform must be fully cloud-based. As well as desktop use, it would be beneficial if it was also compatible with mobile devices so users can easily manage tasks and complete approvals remotely.
2b Data Visibility and Navigation
Easy Transaction Drill-Down: Finance staff should be able to click through transactions naturally-moving from a supplier record straight to relevant invoices, purchase orders, and audit histories without navigating away.
In-System Analysis: Staff need to view and drill down into detailed transactional data directly within the system interface, rather than having to export data to external spreadsheets just to read it.
2c Purchasing, Automation, and Approvals
Integrated Purchasing Portal: We require a user-friendly, school-level portal that handles the entire procurement cycle: requisitioning, multi-level approval workflows, purchase ordering, goods receiving, and budget checks.
Paperless Approvals: The system should automatically email approvers with direct links for simple approvals.A configurable tiered approval process should be built into the software as standard.
Automated Document Dispatch: The software must automatically email purchase orders, invoices, and payment remittances directly to suppliers and internal stakeholders.
Invoice Scanning (OCR): To save time and reduce manual entry errors, the system should scan uploaded PDF invoices and automatically populate the transaction details.
Preferred Supplier Indicators: A simple visual indicator is needed to show school-based users which suppliers have already been vetted and approved by the central Trust procurement team.
Other Document Scanning and Parsing: contract reading capabilities with AI identification of contract terms including renewals, terminations and indexation.
- Core Accounting and Reporting Modules
The chosen software must include robust, established modules for standard school accounting operations. These must be thoroughly developed and uniformly capable across the board:
Cost Centre and Budget Holder Reporting
Trial Balance and Ledger Code Reporting
Aged Debtor and Aged Creditor Reports
Bank Reconciliation (ideally with direct bank feeds or straightforward file imports)
Budgeting, Cashflow, and Forecasting Management Tools
Supplier and Customer Master Files with secure bank detail audit logs
Full Management Accounts direct from the system
- Specific Operational Feedback and Integration Needs
Based on hands-on experience, our finance teams have highlighted a few critical operational expectations:
4a Parity Between Purchase and Sales Ledgers
Many school finance systems focus heavily on the Purchase Ledger while providing a basic, limited Sales Ledger. Consistent capability and reporting depth on both sides would be highly beneficial.
4b IMP Software Integration
The Trust uses IMP for budget planning and forecasting and integrated curriculum financial planning. We are particularly interested in hearing from suppliers whose financial systems can either
integrate dynamically and effectively with our existing IMP environment to keep our data consistent and prevent double-entry
OR
demonstrate an embedded or directly linked Integrated Curriculum Financial Planning (ICFP) module built into the platform that can pull real-time finance and staffing data to run multi-year strategic scenarios natively.
4c Security Roles
To match our internal organisational structure, the system must allow us to set up specific user roles and permissions.
4d Direct Support
When technical issues arise, school-based users need to be able to raise their own tickets directly with the software provider's help desk without having to route these through the central Trust finance team.
The Central Team should have access or reporting capabilities related to these tickets in order to oversee the KPIs of the contract.
- Next Steps for Interested Suppliers
Interested suppliers are invited to submit an expression of interest via email to [email protected] no later than 15th September 2026. Please outline within your expression of interest how you believe your product can deliver on the requirements detailed
- Today21 Oct 2026
- Contract startsin 314 days1 Sept 2027, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published24 Aug 2026, 10:33 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender