Official UK procurement notice
Provision of a fully supported Student Management System
Authority: SRUC
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionSRUC is seeking to implement a fully supported Software as a Service (SaaS) solution that will replace our existing Student Management System and deliver strategic and operational benefits across our undergraduate and post-graduate Teaching activities.
CPV: Educational software package · Planning systems · Software package and information systems
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1The objectives of this procurement include but are not limited to a modernisation and…AwardedRenewal
The objectives of this procurement include but are not limited to a modernisation and enhancement of our current
- timetabling system
- curriculum management
- applications and admissions systems
- student registration
- Fees and Funding
- student support and case management
- post-graduate student management
- statutory and operational reporting.
It is anticipated that the solution will be a modern, future-proofed and highly functional system that shall deliver measurable business efficiencies, benefits and form part of our aspirations for organisation-wide change to processes, systems, controls and employee roles. The solution may also be required to integrate in an up-stream and down-stream manner with other specialist operational systems.
It should be noted that SRUC is also considering opportunities to replace its financial and procurement management system within the next 6 to 12 months. The objectives of this project include but are not limited to a modernisation and enhancement of our current
- operational financial management processes including budgeting, accounts receivable and accounts payable, strategic financial planning and forecasting;
- procurement and contract management;
- financial planning and analysis;
- statutory and management account preparation;
- tax calculations and return preparation;
- pre-award & post-award research management;
- staff expenses;
- asset and stock management;
- credit control.
The requirement for a third smaller project for a work-based learning system is currently also under review.
Any resulting contract for the student management system shall be for an initial period of five years, with the option to extend, by mutual agreement, for five further periods of 12 months.
In accordance with the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015 the procurement process shall follow a two-stage Restricted Procedure and any subsequent contract award shall be based on the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT).
Stage 1: Selection Stage
- Open to all interested suppliers
- Selection shall be based on capability, capacity, experience and financial standing (using the Single Procurement Document Scotland (SPD))
- The SPD shall be scored on a pass / fail basis. As part of the requirements for this tender, the SPD shall confirm that SRUC is seeking a supplier that is fully accredited under ISO27001
- Written tender submissions (See Stage 2, Part 1) must also be submitted along with the SPD.
Stage 2: Tender Stage
- Only suppliers that have passed Stage 1 shall proceed to Part 1 (below) and have their written submission evaluated.
- Part 1 of the tender stage shall be a formal, written response to questions and submission of an initial price. The top three ranked suppliers (based on their score for the written response to questions) shall then be invited to participate in Part 2 of the tender. SRUC anticipates that one Supplier will be selected to provide this service. Further, it should be noted that SRUC reserves the right to vary the selected numbers.
- Part 2 of the tender shall comprise a scored demonstration of the supplier’s system and submission of a final price. It is noted that suppliers can improve and/or vary their price between initial and final submission. It is further noted that SRUC shall not enter a price negotiation with any supplier at any stage of this tender process.
- The scoring from Part 1 and Part 2 shall then be combined to provide a final total score, resulting in the identification of a preferred supplier.
- Confirmation of a contract award to the preferred supplier shall be subject to approval by the Board of SRUC. It is estimated that any such approval shall be discussed at the September 2026 Board meeting.
SRUC regards the implementation of this system as a high risk and complex task. Therefore, SRUC may also seek appropriate implementation consultancy services to support the configuration and implementation of the new system.
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published sub-criteria (4)
- Functional Requirements: 15%
- Non-Functional Requirments: 20%
- Demonstration of Capability: 35%
- price: 30%
Published award criteria (4)
- Functional Requirements: 15
- Non-Functional Requirments: 20
- Demonstration of Capability: 35
- Price: 30
- Price carries 30 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 3 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record · publisher note attached- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Awarded
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- No (one-off requirement)
- First published
- 23 Apr 2026, 10:42 BST
- Last source update
- 6 Oct 2026, 14:38 BST
- Award evaluation window
- 12 Jun 2026 – …
- Authority reference
42509- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-094325- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-068952Find a Tender
- Electronic trading
- e-invoicing allowed · electronic ordering · electronic payment
Publisher note: (SC Ref:844962)
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- 12 Jun 2026, 12:00 BST
- Submission channel
- {"electronicSubmission"}
- Accepted languages
- en
- Bids opened
- 12 Jun 2026, 12:30 BST
Timeline
8 May 2026 → 6 Oct 2026 · 5 dates- Next notice expected167 days ago8 May 2026, 00:00 BST
- Submission deadline131 days ago12 Jun 2026, 12:00 BST
- Bids opened131 days ago12 Jun 2026, 12:30 BST
- Bids must remain valid until21 days ago30 Sept 2026, 23:59 BST
- Notice published15 days ago6 Oct 2026, 14:38 BST
Notice history
4 events · 3 releases on Find a Tender · since 7 May 2026- Status changed to active7 May 2026, 11:19 BST
- Procurement method changed7 May 2026, 11:19 BST
- Deadline published: 12 Jun 2026, 12:00 BST7 May 2026, 11:19 BST
- Status changed to complete6 Oct 2026, 14:38 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast| Awarded to | Value | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology One UK Limited | £2,333,000 † | — | Awarded |
Contracts
Contract 094325-2026-42509-1 · Technology One UK Limited
- Signed
- 2 Oct 2026
- Value
- £2,333,000
- Status
- active
Bid statistics published by the authority
| Bids | SME | VCSE | Valid bid range |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6bids · 6 electronic | 0 | — | — |
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Dispute resolution & review bodies
- The Sheriff CourtReview body
Bidders & participating suppliers
1 commercial party on the notice- Technology One UK LimitedAwarded supplier
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Economic and financial selection criteria
- Technical selection criteria