Official UK procurement notice
In Service Evaluation into Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy and Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SMA and SCID)
Authority: Department of Health & Social Care (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement description- INTRODUCTION
1.1. This general information notice is published to provide information about how the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) will be engaging with interested parties to find one or more strategic collaborator/donor.
1.2. DHSC is seeking expressions of interest from organisations in the voluntary, community, social enterprise (VCSE) and private sectors to collaborate in support of both the capital and revenue commitments to enable the extension at pace of the existing In Service Evaluation (ISE) into newborn Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) screening in England, which will also include evaluating screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID).
1.3. The focus of this collaboration is the financial contribution required for the set up and running of an additional 6 newborn screening centres over a two year period (with the first of the additional centres looking to be operational by Q3 of 2027)
1.4. This is not a public procurement or sponsorship opportunity and will not result in the award of a “public contract” (within the meaning of the Procurement Act 2023). DHSC is specifically looking for financial contributions and wishes to hear from interested parties who can help us to:
- Extend the screening and laboratory testing process to enable all babies in England to receive the offer of screening.
- Help with the early identification of SMA in newborns by extending the evaluation of SMA / SCID screening to an additional 6 labs.
Engagement process and deadline
1.5. Full details of the requirement can be found within section 3 of this document. Those wishing to participate in the engagement process should register their interest by completing and submitting the questionnaire at the following link:
forms.office.com/e/2FwiSsY8ib ↗
1.6. The closing date for responses is on: 7th August at 23.59 pm. We reserve the right not to accept responses after this time.
1.7. We will be using a fair and non-discriminatory evaluation method to select interested parties to enter into discussions regarding a potential collaboration/donation agreement following the close of the early market engagement process.
1.8. DHSC will carry out due diligence relating to your organisation’s financial position, track record and other information it reasonably deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy itself as to the accuracy and adequacy of the responses received. This may involve the use of a range of tools and sources including, but not limited to, data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI).
1.9. DHSC intends to select organisations to collaborate with, but it reserves its right to select fewer organisations and/or not form a collaboration/donation agreement.
1.10. The questionnaire contains 4 questions for interested parties to answer. Each question refers to a key aspect of the requirements set out in Appendix 1. Each question will be scored on a scale of 0-4 using the scoring criteria set out below:
Score Criteria for awarding score
0 Failure to understand requirements and provides no confidence that the requirement will be met.
1 The response meets some elements of the requirement but falls short in many significant areas. There are strong reservations because the response shows:
Some misunderstandings of the requirements and insufficient supporting information is provided. It provides low confidence that the requirements will be met.
2 The response broadly meets what is expected for the requirements, but there are some areas of concern. The response shows:
A basic understanding of the requirements and a minimum level of supporting information provided. It provides reasonable confidence that the requirements will be met.
3 The response meets the requirements in all material respects, with no or few areas of concern. The response shows:
A good understanding of the requirements and a good level of supporting information provided. It provides good degree confidence that the requirements will be met.
4 The response exceeds many aspects of the requirements. There are no areas of concern. The response shows:
A very good understanding of the requirements and very good level of supporting information provided. It provides a high degree of confidence that the requirements will be met.
- BACKGROUND
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) in newborns is a severe genetic condition that affects the motor nerves in the spinal cord. This nerve damage leads to progressive muscle weakness, severely impacting a baby’s ability to move, swallow, and breathe. It is a leading genetic cause of infant mortality.
SMA is caused by a missing or faulty gene called SMN1. For a baby to be born with SMA, both biological parents must be carriers of this mutated gene and pass it on to their child. Carriers typically show no symptoms themselves.
In many countries, SMA is now included in routine newborn screening programs (often part of the newborn blood spot or "heel prick" test) to allow for early diagnosis before symptoms even begin. Diagnostic confirmation involves a simple genetic blood test.
Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is the name given to a group of rare, inherited disorders that cause major abnormalities of the immune system. They form part of a larger group of conditions known as primary immunodeficiencies. The immune system abnormalities in SCID lead to greatly increased risks of infection and other complications that are life-threatening. Affected infants become unwell within the first few months of life, and before modern medication and treatments were available, most affected babies did not survive beyond their first year.
At present, DHSC via NHS England are currently funding the implementation of “in-service evaluation” SMA screening in seven of England's thirteen newborn blood spot screening laboratories, (screening 410,000 babies per year). All of these seven laboratories possess the infrastructure, workforce expertise and operational capability required. These laboratories are also currently delivering Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) screening using the same testing platform and processes.
To move at pace and lift screening capacity to all 13 screening laboratories which would provide coverage to the whole of England (additional 185,000 babies per year) further financial support is required.
CPV: Diagnostic agents · Health services · Medical analysis services · Medical specialist services · Miscellaneous health services · Pharmacy services · Research and experimental development services · Research services · Services provided by medical laboratories
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Department of Health & Social Care buys Miscellaneous health services (CPV 8514), and who usually turns up
Department of Health & Social Care’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Miscellaneous health services (CPV 8514) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in Greater London (authority’s region).
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in Greater London.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 31 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid38% / 5%
2–313% / 68%
4–638% / 21%
7+13% / 5%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate50% / 15%
Within ±2%50% / 62%
Above estimate0% / 23%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 8514Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 19 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid5%
2–368%
4–621%
7+5%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 16 Jul 2026, 10:55 BST
- Last source update
- 16 Jul 2026, 11:04 BST
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-067135- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06cc9dFind a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
16 Jul 2026 → 10 Aug 2026 · 3 dates- Planning notice published97 days ago16 Jul 2026, 10:55 BST
- Market engagement74 days ago7 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
We are seeking interested parties who are willing to provide :
- Financial support to enable the extension of the existing SMA and SCID programmes, increasing national coverage from seven to thirteen laboratories. (this is expected to be in the region of £5.5 M for the 2 year period).
- Financial support to meet capital investment and revenue costs associated with establishing and operating the six additional laboratories over a two-year period
- Financial investment to amplify and extend existing screening research, generating the robust evidence required to inform the review and support any future recommendations. Should the programme be recommended for implementation, funding is anticipated to be secured through the Spending Review process.
- Financial support for project team funding to optimise implementation of the extension
In return, DHSC may:
- Seek opportunities to secure Minister promotion of the contribution made by all collaborating organisations
- Seek opportunities once funding is secured to move at pace to implement the role out via NHS England of further screening and laboratory testing to widen the newborn screening programme
- Seek to build data and evidence from the existing 7 and collaborator funded 6 screening laboratories
- Enable screening laboratories to provide additional expertise and evidence to support ongoing funding for the likely onward continuation of the programme via the spending review process and UKNSC recommendations
Please respond using the following link: forms.office.com/e/2FwiSsY8ib ↗
All responses must be submitted by 7th August 2026 at 23:59pm. We reserve the right not to accept responses after this time.
Press release: Every baby in England to get life-saving genetic test from birth (www.gov.uk/government/news/ever… ↗)
- Contract starts72 days ago10 Aug 2026, 00:00 BST
Notice history
2 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 16 Jul 2026- Preliminary market engagement notice published16 Jul 2026, 10:55 BSTUK2
- Preliminary market engagement notice published16 Jul 2026, 11:04 BSTUK2
Published amendments (1)
Link Formatting
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender